# |
Mar 12th 2009, 09:29 |
alkemann |
i mean that u can tag an article as deprecated, but using the word marker instead of tag since we have a concept for tags |
# |
Mar 12th 2009, 09:28 |
ADmad |
then can you please clarify what are "markers" ? |
# |
Mar 12th 2009, 09:28 |
alkemann |
ok.. "no" |
# |
Mar 12th 2009, 09:28 |
ADmad |
i am confused.. isnt there a yes/no answer to my question :) |
# |
Mar 12th 2009, 09:27 |
alkemann |
i mean tags, but not to be confused with Tags |
# |
Mar 12th 2009, 09:26 |
ADmad |
alkemann: " a set of "markers" .." you mean content pages describing best practices and so on ? |
# |
Mar 12th 2009, 07:19 |
alkemann |
http://thechaw.com/bakery/wiki/spec/articles/moderation |
# |
Mar 11th 2009, 11:17 |
AD7six |
well, at least I didn't say anything I wouldn't have said to him in person |
# |
Mar 11th 2009, 11:16 |
ADmad |
hmm.. me thinks d1rk is the same Dirk |
# |
Mar 11th 2009, 11:11 |
AD7six |
why would you modify your db for a one-off form process |
# |
Mar 11th 2009, 11:10 |
AD7six |
I dislike the "what a wrong approach, bad idea, noise [because I have some weird design ideas]" sentiment |
# |
Mar 11th 2009, 11:09 |
ADmad |
he seems to be a security freak.. same way ionas was suggesting passing of the fieldList param to be made compulsary |
# |
Mar 11th 2009, 11:08 |
ADmad |
heh |
# |
Mar 11th 2009, 11:08 |
AD7six |
they're all from dirk with a bee in his bonnet |
# |
Mar 11th 2009, 11:07 |
jperras |
wow, how can there be so many comments on such a simple thing |
# |
Mar 11th 2009, 11:06 |
_nate_ |
ACTION is looking... |
# |
Mar 11th 2009, 11:04 |
AD7six |
like the comments :) |
# |
Mar 11th 2009, 11:03 |
ADmad |
_nate_: teknoid stole your snippet about blacklist and made a post :) http://teknoid.wordpress.com/2009/03/11/blacklist-your-model-fields-for-save/ |
# |
Mar 11th 2009, 10:14 |
alkemann |
well im gonna go wish my grandma a happy birthday. laters :) |
# |
Mar 11th 2009, 10:02 |
AD7six |
I only found out when replies showed up including mariano_iglesias's messages after my pm |
# |
Mar 11th 2009, 10:02 |
AD7six |
I think I was pm-ing users that mariano had already contacted previously |
# |
Mar 11th 2009, 10:02 |
jperras |
just to prevent the same author from being bombarded by several moderators at the same time |
# |
Mar 11th 2009, 10:02 |
jperras |
ok |
# |
Mar 11th 2009, 10:02 |
AD7six |
I think it didn't used to but got fixed jperras |
# |
Mar 11th 2009, 10:02 |
gwoo |
yes |
# |
Mar 11th 2009, 10:02 |
gwoo |
jperras: all moderators |
# |
Mar 11th 2009, 10:01 |
jperras |
gwoo: does that show up for all? |
# |
Mar 11th 2009, 10:01 |
alkemann |
moderators can see all author PMs? |
# |
Mar 11th 2009, 10:01 |
gwoo |
then they have not been contacted |
# |
Mar 11th 2009, 10:01 |
gwoo |
jperras: if there is no author PM |
# |
Mar 11th 2009, 10:01 |
gwoo |
but i want the policy to stay the same |
# |
Mar 11th 2009, 10:01 |
jperras |
I don't think there is currently a way of determining if an author has already been contacted by a moderator, iirc. |
# |
Mar 11th 2009, 10:01 |
gwoo |
good |
# |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:59 |
alkemann |
i am willing to put my $ where my mouth is yes |
# |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:58 |
gwoo |
mariano_iglesias: can make you a publishe=r |
# |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:58 |
gwoo |
alkemann: you want to take over that job? |
# |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:58 |
gwoo |
yes, and mariano_iglesias usually does a good job of that |
# |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:56 |
alkemann |
the "nice" part of my argument is that if moderators explain what an author could do to improve it, in many cases they would |
# |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:56 |
AD7six |
alkemann: I don't know what you're expecting me to say, I don't see this conversation going anywhere |
# |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:55 |
alkemann |
AD7six: how fair will it be to let people publish their articles now, and in a month or two when bakery 2.0 goes online, their articles are cut? |
# |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:54 |
AD7six |
oh I don't disagree (more importantly I don't disagree with your overall point) - but I don't think the overall policy should change until bakery 2. |