Log message #583976

# At Username Text
# Mar 11th 2009, 11:17 AD7six well, at least I didn't say anything I wouldn't have said to him in person
# Mar 11th 2009, 11:16 ADmad hmm.. me thinks d1rk is the same Dirk
# Mar 11th 2009, 11:11 AD7six why would you modify your db for a one-off form process
# Mar 11th 2009, 11:10 AD7six I dislike the "what a wrong approach, bad idea, noise [because I have some weird design ideas]" sentiment
# Mar 11th 2009, 11:09 ADmad he seems to be a security freak.. same way ionas was suggesting passing of the fieldList param to be made compulsary
# Mar 11th 2009, 11:08 ADmad heh
# Mar 11th 2009, 11:08 AD7six they're all from dirk with a bee in his bonnet
# Mar 11th 2009, 11:07 jperras wow, how can there be so many comments on such a simple thing
# Mar 11th 2009, 11:06 _nate_ ACTION is looking...
# Mar 11th 2009, 11:04 AD7six like the comments :)
# Mar 11th 2009, 11:03 ADmad _nate_: teknoid stole your snippet about blacklist and made a post :) http://teknoid.wordpress.com/2009/03/11/blacklist-your-model-fields-for-save/
# Mar 11th 2009, 10:14 alkemann well im gonna go wish my grandma a happy birthday. laters :)
# Mar 11th 2009, 10:02 AD7six I only found out when replies showed up including mariano_iglesias's messages after my pm
# Mar 11th 2009, 10:02 AD7six I think I was pm-ing users that mariano had already contacted previously
# Mar 11th 2009, 10:02 jperras just to prevent the same author from being bombarded by several moderators at the same time
# Mar 11th 2009, 10:02 jperras ok
# Mar 11th 2009, 10:02 AD7six I think it didn't used to but got fixed jperras
# Mar 11th 2009, 10:02 gwoo yes
# Mar 11th 2009, 10:02 gwoo jperras: all moderators
# Mar 11th 2009, 10:01 jperras gwoo: does that show up for all?
# Mar 11th 2009, 10:01 alkemann moderators can see all author PMs?
# Mar 11th 2009, 10:01 gwoo then they have not been contacted
# Mar 11th 2009, 10:01 gwoo jperras: if there is no author PM
# Mar 11th 2009, 10:01 gwoo but i want the policy to stay the same
# Mar 11th 2009, 10:01 jperras I don't think there is currently a way of determining if an author has already been contacted by a moderator, iirc.
# Mar 11th 2009, 10:01 gwoo good
# Mar 11th 2009, 09:59 alkemann i am willing to put my $ where my mouth is yes
# Mar 11th 2009, 09:58 gwoo mariano_iglesias: can make you a publishe=r
# Mar 11th 2009, 09:58 gwoo alkemann: you want to take over that job?
# Mar 11th 2009, 09:58 gwoo yes, and mariano_iglesias usually does a good job of that
# Mar 11th 2009, 09:56 alkemann the "nice" part of my argument is that if moderators explain what an author could do to improve it, in many cases they would
# Mar 11th 2009, 09:56 AD7six alkemann: I don't know what you're expecting me to say, I don't see this conversation going anywhere
# Mar 11th 2009, 09:55 alkemann AD7six: how fair will it be to let people publish their articles now, and in a month or two when bakery 2.0 goes online, their articles are cut?
# Mar 11th 2009, 09:54 AD7six oh I don't disagree (more importantly I don't disagree with your overall point) - but I don't think the overall policy should change until bakery 2.
# Mar 11th 2009, 09:53 AD7six there hasn't been a specific change of policy
# Mar 11th 2009, 09:53 alkemann by proxy, cake core team supports all bakery articles, it's important to have QA even if some authors feels they have "done enough"
# Mar 11th 2009, 09:53 AD7six "why is my article held back wanting xyz when there are so many already published without it"
# Mar 11th 2009, 09:53 AD7six alkemann: there are n (where n is a big number) of articles that authors refer to to know what to do
# Mar 11th 2009, 09:52 alkemann AD7six: i dont understand relevance of fairness
# Mar 11th 2009, 09:52 jperras context is important
# Mar 11th 2009, 09:52 jperras alkemann: I think that's a reasonable requirement, yes.