| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 09:35 |
alkemann |
thats a use case. lets say an article has valuable ideas, but the author hasnt expressed them well or implemented it good. it could be published as inspiration to others, but marked properly so people doesnt take it as canon |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 09:33 |
ADmad |
alkemann: so a not so nice article is published but with markers for users to see |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 09:32 |
ADmad |
hmmm |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 09:32 |
alkemann |
with broader uses and implications |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 09:32 |
alkemann |
well. look at it as a tool for moderators to comment on what an author needs to improve on |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 09:30 |
ADmad |
ok got it but dont understand how exactly it relates to moderation |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 09:29 |
alkemann |
i mean that u can tag an article as deprecated, but using the word marker instead of tag since we have a concept for tags |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 09:28 |
ADmad |
then can you please clarify what are "markers" ? |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 09:28 |
alkemann |
ok.. "no" |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 09:28 |
ADmad |
i am confused.. isnt there a yes/no answer to my question :) |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 09:27 |
alkemann |
i mean tags, but not to be confused with Tags |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 09:26 |
ADmad |
alkemann: " a set of "markers" .." you mean content pages describing best practices and so on ? |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 07:19 |
alkemann |
http://thechaw.com/bakery/wiki/spec/articles/moderation |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 11:17 |
AD7six |
well, at least I didn't say anything I wouldn't have said to him in person |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 11:16 |
ADmad |
hmm.. me thinks d1rk is the same Dirk |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 11:11 |
AD7six |
why would you modify your db for a one-off form process |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 11:10 |
AD7six |
I dislike the "what a wrong approach, bad idea, noise [because I have some weird design ideas]" sentiment |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 11:09 |
ADmad |
he seems to be a security freak.. same way ionas was suggesting passing of the fieldList param to be made compulsary |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 11:08 |
ADmad |
heh |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 11:08 |
AD7six |
they're all from dirk with a bee in his bonnet |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 11:07 |
jperras |
wow, how can there be so many comments on such a simple thing |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 11:06 |
_nate_ |
ACTION is looking... |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 11:04 |
AD7six |
like the comments :) |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 11:03 |
ADmad |
_nate_: teknoid stole your snippet about blacklist and made a post :) http://teknoid.wordpress.com/2009/03/11/blacklist-your-model-fields-for-save/ |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 10:14 |
alkemann |
well im gonna go wish my grandma a happy birthday. laters :) |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 10:02 |
AD7six |
I only found out when replies showed up including mariano_iglesias's messages after my pm |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 10:02 |
AD7six |
I think I was pm-ing users that mariano had already contacted previously |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 10:02 |
jperras |
just to prevent the same author from being bombarded by several moderators at the same time |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 10:02 |
jperras |
ok |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 10:02 |
AD7six |
I think it didn't used to but got fixed jperras |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 10:02 |
gwoo |
yes |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 10:02 |
gwoo |
jperras: all moderators |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 10:01 |
jperras |
gwoo: does that show up for all? |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 10:01 |
alkemann |
moderators can see all author PMs? |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 10:01 |
gwoo |
then they have not been contacted |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 10:01 |
gwoo |
jperras: if there is no author PM |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 10:01 |
gwoo |
but i want the policy to stay the same |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 10:01 |
jperras |
I don't think there is currently a way of determining if an author has already been contacted by a moderator, iirc. |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 10:01 |
gwoo |
good |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:59 |
alkemann |
i am willing to put my $ where my mouth is yes |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:58 |
gwoo |
mariano_iglesias: can make you a publishe=r |