Log message #536407

# At Username Text
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:51 alkemann damn wireless
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:50 ADmad alkemann: glad you decided to stop bouncing and join in for good :)
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:49 alkemann flag even
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:49 alkemann a flad should be enough.
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:49 AD7six I assume so, I'm just provoking a dialogue :)
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:49 alkemann community owned articles are either when an author abandons it by giving it up to the community or when moderators cant get hold of the author and it needs to be updated.
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:48 ADmad shouldnt a flag be enough ?
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:48 AD7six should that be handled by the permission system, or via a flag on article do you think?
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:47 ADmad *can update
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:47 ADmad regarding community i think it means any user and update the article.. (wasnt present when community owned was discussed)
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:46 ADmad guess so
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:46 AD7six yeah that's what I mean - so add the structure for that?
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:45 ADmad for each page then i guess we need more than a tinyint
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:45 ADmad if we want a default title like "Code examples and usage description
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:44 AD7six and is "Code pages should be forced to put in these pages, optionally add more:" intended to be enforced by the app, or is it a tinyint on category?
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:42 AD7six what does Articles can be set as Community owned by author, or moderator mean
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:37 ADmad check the bottom of that page
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:37 ADmad AD7six: the n00bs are getting to you :P
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:37 AD7six but then, like usual lately, I slept only 4 hrs last night
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:37 AD7six I skimmed it and did n't notice anything standing out
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:37 gwoo ADmad: jinx :P
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:36 ADmad yes... plz check http://thechaw.com/bakery/wiki/spec/articles
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:36 gwoo it should all be in there
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:36 gwoo AD7six: did you read the articles spec?
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:36 AD7six oh nice, so a min_pages field in categories?
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:35 ADmad AD7six: yes i do... actual content in pages... thats fine... cause we were also wanting to impose a min. number of pages for an article based on its type..
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:34 AD7six ADmad: k. putting that to one side for a sec, do you agree with the idea of 'article' having no textual content in it?
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:33 ADmad so we thought just specify the language when posting an article... than when someone wants to translate it just keep a link back to the original
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:33 AD7six but there's more than one way to do things, so what changes would you propose therefore
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:32 AD7six that's a given/fully understood and I'm glad to see it stated
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:32 AD7six I'm adding a revision.based_on_id to the book
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:32 ADmad the idea behind this is bakery wont have any default language or have 1:1 translations
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:31 AD7six what was the reasoning for wanting to do it that way - linking an article to a previous article would not allow "the original for this changed" to be accurately stored/determined
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:30 ADmad maybe b4 you joined :)
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:30 AD7six and at a guess after I left
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:30 ADmad unfortunately it was b4 this channel was logged :P
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:29 ADmad that was the general concenses when we last dicussed that
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:29 AD7six but that reminds me of something I need to add to the book :P
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:28 AD7six I don't see that as simpler, is it desired?
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:27 ADmad AD7six: your schema doesnt seem to have field for this => "For simpler organization translations of an article will be posted as new articles but they will be linked to the one they are translated from"
# Feb 19th 2009, 12:23 AD7six well, with the code the last I looked at it that is.