| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:48 |
ADmad |
shouldnt a flag be enough ? |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:48 |
AD7six |
should that be handled by the permission system, or via a flag on article do you think? |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:47 |
ADmad |
*can update |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:47 |
ADmad |
regarding community i think it means any user and update the article.. (wasnt present when community owned was discussed) |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:46 |
ADmad |
guess so |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:46 |
AD7six |
yeah that's what I mean - so add the structure for that? |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:45 |
ADmad |
for each page then i guess we need more than a tinyint |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:45 |
ADmad |
if we want a default title like "Code examples and usage description |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:44 |
AD7six |
and is "Code pages should be forced to put in these pages, optionally add more:" intended to be enforced by the app, or is it a tinyint on category? |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:42 |
AD7six |
what does Articles can be set as Community owned by author, or moderator mean |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:37 |
ADmad |
check the bottom of that page |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:37 |
ADmad |
AD7six: the n00bs are getting to you :P |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:37 |
AD7six |
but then, like usual lately, I slept only 4 hrs last night |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:37 |
AD7six |
I skimmed it and did n't notice anything standing out |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:37 |
gwoo |
ADmad: jinx :P |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:36 |
ADmad |
yes... plz check http://thechaw.com/bakery/wiki/spec/articles |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:36 |
gwoo |
it should all be in there |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:36 |
gwoo |
AD7six: did you read the articles spec? |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:36 |
AD7six |
oh nice, so a min_pages field in categories? |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:35 |
ADmad |
AD7six: yes i do... actual content in pages... thats fine... cause we were also wanting to impose a min. number of pages for an article based on its type.. |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:34 |
AD7six |
ADmad: k. putting that to one side for a sec, do you agree with the idea of 'article' having no textual content in it? |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:33 |
ADmad |
so we thought just specify the language when posting an article... than when someone wants to translate it just keep a link back to the original |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:33 |
AD7six |
but there's more than one way to do things, so what changes would you propose therefore |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:32 |
AD7six |
that's a given/fully understood and I'm glad to see it stated |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:32 |
AD7six |
I'm adding a revision.based_on_id to the book |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:32 |
ADmad |
the idea behind this is bakery wont have any default language or have 1:1 translations |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:31 |
AD7six |
what was the reasoning for wanting to do it that way - linking an article to a previous article would not allow "the original for this changed" to be accurately stored/determined |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:30 |
ADmad |
maybe b4 you joined :) |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:30 |
AD7six |
and at a guess after I left |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:30 |
ADmad |
unfortunately it was b4 this channel was logged :P |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:29 |
ADmad |
that was the general concenses when we last dicussed that |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:29 |
AD7six |
but that reminds me of something I need to add to the book :P |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:28 |
AD7six |
I don't see that as simpler, is it desired? |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:27 |
ADmad |
AD7six: your schema doesnt seem to have field for this => "For simpler organization translations of an article will be posted as new articles but they will be linked to the one they are translated from" |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:23 |
AD7six |
well, with the code the last I looked at it that is. |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:22 |
AD7six |
jperras: would need dto be a task rather than a tell for a ~command to be channel aware afaik. |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:21 |
AD7six |
I see some stuff I forgot to remove/simplify |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:19 |
AD7six |
user (and profile) aren't shown in detail. and I've ommitted whatever permission/role tables/data would be required |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:17 |
AD7six |
for comment http://drop.io/bakeryschema |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:12 |
ADmad |
jperras: take that up with Predominant :) |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:10 |
alkemann |
jperras: i meant in ur browser on the default location of ~logs |