| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:49 |
alkemann |
a flad should be enough. |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:49 |
AD7six |
I assume so, I'm just provoking a dialogue :) |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:49 |
alkemann |
community owned articles are either when an author abandons it by giving it up to the community or when moderators cant get hold of the author and it needs to be updated. |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:48 |
ADmad |
shouldnt a flag be enough ? |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:48 |
AD7six |
should that be handled by the permission system, or via a flag on article do you think? |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:47 |
ADmad |
*can update |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:47 |
ADmad |
regarding community i think it means any user and update the article.. (wasnt present when community owned was discussed) |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:46 |
ADmad |
guess so |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:46 |
AD7six |
yeah that's what I mean - so add the structure for that? |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:45 |
ADmad |
for each page then i guess we need more than a tinyint |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:45 |
ADmad |
if we want a default title like "Code examples and usage description |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:44 |
AD7six |
and is "Code pages should be forced to put in these pages, optionally add more:" intended to be enforced by the app, or is it a tinyint on category? |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:42 |
AD7six |
what does Articles can be set as Community owned by author, or moderator mean |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:37 |
ADmad |
check the bottom of that page |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:37 |
ADmad |
AD7six: the n00bs are getting to you :P |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:37 |
AD7six |
but then, like usual lately, I slept only 4 hrs last night |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:37 |
AD7six |
I skimmed it and did n't notice anything standing out |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:37 |
gwoo |
ADmad: jinx :P |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:36 |
ADmad |
yes... plz check http://thechaw.com/bakery/wiki/spec/articles |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:36 |
gwoo |
it should all be in there |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:36 |
gwoo |
AD7six: did you read the articles spec? |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:36 |
AD7six |
oh nice, so a min_pages field in categories? |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:35 |
ADmad |
AD7six: yes i do... actual content in pages... thats fine... cause we were also wanting to impose a min. number of pages for an article based on its type.. |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:34 |
AD7six |
ADmad: k. putting that to one side for a sec, do you agree with the idea of 'article' having no textual content in it? |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:33 |
ADmad |
so we thought just specify the language when posting an article... than when someone wants to translate it just keep a link back to the original |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:33 |
AD7six |
but there's more than one way to do things, so what changes would you propose therefore |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:32 |
AD7six |
that's a given/fully understood and I'm glad to see it stated |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:32 |
AD7six |
I'm adding a revision.based_on_id to the book |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:32 |
ADmad |
the idea behind this is bakery wont have any default language or have 1:1 translations |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:31 |
AD7six |
what was the reasoning for wanting to do it that way - linking an article to a previous article would not allow "the original for this changed" to be accurately stored/determined |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:30 |
ADmad |
maybe b4 you joined :) |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:30 |
AD7six |
and at a guess after I left |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:30 |
ADmad |
unfortunately it was b4 this channel was logged :P |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:29 |
ADmad |
that was the general concenses when we last dicussed that |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:29 |
AD7six |
but that reminds me of something I need to add to the book :P |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:28 |
AD7six |
I don't see that as simpler, is it desired? |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:27 |
ADmad |
AD7six: your schema doesnt seem to have field for this => "For simpler organization translations of an article will be posted as new articles but they will be linked to the one they are translated from" |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:23 |
AD7six |
well, with the code the last I looked at it that is. |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:22 |
AD7six |
jperras: would need dto be a task rather than a tell for a ~command to be channel aware afaik. |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:21 |
AD7six |
I see some stuff I forgot to remove/simplify |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:19 |
AD7six |
user (and profile) aren't shown in detail. and I've ommitted whatever permission/role tables/data would be required |