| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:01 |
AD7six |
that's not talking about model behaviors |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:01 |
AD7six |
alkemann yes? |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:01 |
alkemann1 |
AD7sixalkemann: how about rather than specifically deprecated, optionally (by admin) attaching 'behavior' to tags |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:00 |
AD7six |
I didn't mention a model behavior |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:59 |
alkemann1 |
deprecated (or mentioned tag) behavior |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:59 |
AD7six |
what logic |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:58 |
alkemann1 |
dont u think it would be much mroe effective to hav the logic in the model isntead of a habtm joined model? |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:58 |
ADmad |
like that idea |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:58 |
ADmad |
yup yup |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:58 |
AD7six |
ADmad: actually the template thing could behandled simply as a 'special' article for each category |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:57 |
alkemann1 |
AD7six: behavior to tags.. him.. |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:57 |
AD7six |
http://img511.imageshack.us/img511/173/schematicmneatoml0.png |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:56 |
AD7six |
yeah it does suck |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:56 |
AD7six |
I don't know if that's very useful (?) just thinking of a more general use for the code |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:55 |
AD7six |
alkemann: how about rather than specifically deprecated, optionally (by admin) attaching 'behavior' to tags |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:54 |
alkemann |
so something i thought about earlier that at least poLK liked. including the deprecated article feature from debuggable |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:53 |
alkemann |
kinda major weakness :( |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:52 |
AD7six |
yeah sucks doesn't it (I thought it, the app, looked cool till I couldn't read it) |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:52 |
ADmad |
AD7six: could you please post the next iteration of the schema somewhere where the full size can be viewed without dloading.. |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:51 |
alkemann |
damn wireless |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:50 |
ADmad |
alkemann: glad you decided to stop bouncing and join in for good :) |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:49 |
alkemann |
flag even |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:49 |
alkemann |
a flad should be enough. |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:49 |
AD7six |
I assume so, I'm just provoking a dialogue :) |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:49 |
alkemann |
community owned articles are either when an author abandons it by giving it up to the community or when moderators cant get hold of the author and it needs to be updated. |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:48 |
ADmad |
shouldnt a flag be enough ? |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:48 |
AD7six |
should that be handled by the permission system, or via a flag on article do you think? |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:47 |
ADmad |
*can update |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:47 |
ADmad |
regarding community i think it means any user and update the article.. (wasnt present when community owned was discussed) |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:46 |
ADmad |
guess so |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:46 |
AD7six |
yeah that's what I mean - so add the structure for that? |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:45 |
ADmad |
for each page then i guess we need more than a tinyint |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:45 |
ADmad |
if we want a default title like "Code examples and usage description |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:44 |
AD7six |
and is "Code pages should be forced to put in these pages, optionally add more:" intended to be enforced by the app, or is it a tinyint on category? |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:42 |
AD7six |
what does Articles can be set as Community owned by author, or moderator mean |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:37 |
ADmad |
check the bottom of that page |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:37 |
ADmad |
AD7six: the n00bs are getting to you :P |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:37 |
AD7six |
but then, like usual lately, I slept only 4 hrs last night |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:37 |
AD7six |
I skimmed it and did n't notice anything standing out |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:37 |
gwoo |
ADmad: jinx :P |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:36 |
ADmad |
yes... plz check http://thechaw.com/bakery/wiki/spec/articles |
