# |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:36 |
gwoo |
it should all be in there |
# |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:36 |
gwoo |
AD7six: did you read the articles spec? |
# |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:36 |
AD7six |
oh nice, so a min_pages field in categories? |
# |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:35 |
ADmad |
AD7six: yes i do... actual content in pages... thats fine... cause we were also wanting to impose a min. number of pages for an article based on its type.. |
# |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:34 |
AD7six |
ADmad: k. putting that to one side for a sec, do you agree with the idea of 'article' having no textual content in it? |
# |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:33 |
ADmad |
so we thought just specify the language when posting an article... than when someone wants to translate it just keep a link back to the original |
# |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:33 |
AD7six |
but there's more than one way to do things, so what changes would you propose therefore |
# |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:32 |
AD7six |
that's a given/fully understood and I'm glad to see it stated |
# |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:32 |
AD7six |
I'm adding a revision.based_on_id to the book |
# |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:32 |
ADmad |
the idea behind this is bakery wont have any default language or have 1:1 translations |
# |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:31 |
AD7six |
what was the reasoning for wanting to do it that way - linking an article to a previous article would not allow "the original for this changed" to be accurately stored/determined |
# |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:30 |
ADmad |
maybe b4 you joined :) |
# |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:30 |
AD7six |
and at a guess after I left |
# |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:30 |
ADmad |
unfortunately it was b4 this channel was logged :P |
# |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:29 |
ADmad |
that was the general concenses when we last dicussed that |
# |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:29 |
AD7six |
but that reminds me of something I need to add to the book :P |
# |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:28 |
AD7six |
I don't see that as simpler, is it desired? |
# |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:27 |
ADmad |
AD7six: your schema doesnt seem to have field for this => "For simpler organization translations of an article will be posted as new articles but they will be linked to the one they are translated from" |
# |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:23 |
AD7six |
well, with the code the last I looked at it that is. |
# |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:22 |
AD7six |
jperras: would need dto be a task rather than a tell for a ~command to be channel aware afaik. |
# |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:21 |
AD7six |
I see some stuff I forgot to remove/simplify |
# |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:19 |
AD7six |
user (and profile) aren't shown in detail. and I've ommitted whatever permission/role tables/data would be required |
# |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:17 |
AD7six |
for comment http://drop.io/bakeryschema |
# |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:12 |
ADmad |
jperras: take that up with Predominant :) |
# |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:10 |
alkemann |
jperras: i meant in ur browser on the default location of ~logs |
# |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:09 |
jperras |
so that you can get http://irc.cakephp.org/logs/view/cakephp-bakery instead of the #cakephp deafult logs url |
# |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:09 |
jperras |
what I meant was that the cakebot should be channel-aware in the ~logs command |
# |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:08 |
jperras |
alkemann: that would imply that I have a logs tab ;-). my irc client is terminal based |
# |
Feb 19th 2009, 11:56 |
ADmad |
http://irc.cakephp.org/logs |
# |
Feb 19th 2009, 11:56 |
alkemann |
click the logs tab and select this channel |
# |
Feb 19th 2009, 11:56 |
ADmad |
you mean u cant find the logs for this channel ? |
# |
Feb 19th 2009, 11:53 |
jperras |
the ~logs call |
# |
Feb 19th 2009, 11:53 |
ADmad |
what isnt ? |
# |
Feb 19th 2009, 11:51 |
jperras |
that's not right |
# |
Feb 19th 2009, 11:51 |
jperras |
hmm |
# |
Feb 19th 2009, 11:51 |
jperras |
~logs |
# |
Feb 19th 2009, 11:50 |
ADmad |
ACTION is checking the logs :) |
# |
Feb 19th 2009, 11:49 |
gwoo |
sup ADmad |
# |
Feb 19th 2009, 11:47 |
ADmad |
greetings bakers |
# |
Feb 19th 2009, 10:59 |
jperras |
enough for me to shell out the $80US for it without blinking |
# |
Feb 19th 2009, 10:59 |
jperras |
it's pretty good |