Page 20 of 134, showing 100 records out of 13,394 total, starting on record 1,901, ending on 2,000
| # | Username | Text | |
|---|---|---|---|
| # | Apr 24th 2010, 02:37 | savant | it never works for comments |
| # | Apr 24th 2010, 02:37 | Predominant_ | Has Akismet stopped working? |
| # | Apr 24th 2010, 02:22 | savant | bakery article of the year: applewebdata://4286E71B-D22A-49C8-8F33-5AAE5141FDAC/articles/view/is-anybody-going-to-fight-spam-here |
| # | Apr 16th 2010, 14:30 | savant | Predominant: hai |
| # | Apr 15th 2010, 01:26 | Predominant | nm |
| # | Apr 15th 2010, 01:25 | Predominant | ohhhh |
| # | Apr 15th 2010, 01:25 | Predominant | But there was a.. |
| # | Apr 15th 2010, 01:25 | Predominant | it says "No change detected or there's already an identical submission pending" |
| # | Apr 15th 2010, 01:25 | Predominant | Cant seem to edit http://book.cakephp.org/edit/75/Saving-Your-Data |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 20:17 | Predominant | Oops |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 20:16 | Predominant | Try |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 20:12 | savant | one hell of an itch i picked to scratch |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 20:11 | savant | scratching an itch |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 20:11 | Predominant | savant: I understand :-) |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 20:11 | Predominant | Ahh |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 19:39 | savant | the only reason im doing this is because I want to get it to a point where I can add spam protection so I stop getting comment spam emails |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 19:38 | savant | that was my plan all along. why, am I going to be upset about what was actually planned? |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 19:35 | savant | at least that is my intention |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 19:35 | savant | with like actual 1.3 conventions |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 19:35 | savant | im making the existing bakery work completely in 1.3 |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 19:34 | Predominant | I'm sorry, savant. Are you porting the existing bakery, for some reason? |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 19:34 | savant | so I dont know what is happening |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 19:33 | savant | and, well, the actual db has a 255 character field for the password |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 19:33 | savant | I mean, AuthComponent does hashing by default to 40 chars |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 19:33 | savant | so ummm, since Im going to change this all to AuthComponent, do I get to see my actual password? |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 18:58 | savant | that was a fun bug to trace and fix |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 18:58 | savant | another, intermittent, issue was the bbcode formatter breaking when there was a large incoming bit of encoded code. for whatever reason the regex just breaks completely in 5.3.1 when there are large bits. not sure why, but I solved it by storing the unencoded code in an array and then replacing it with a hash of that code before encoding/decoding |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 18:54 | savant | lots of the code is still yucky (using a custom Model::read() function) but it looks like it works and can be refactored |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 18:54 | savant | I have gotten it to the point where most (all?) public actions work. I haven't tested commenting, but theoretically that works as well |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 18:53 | savant | im just trying to stay away from building custom components or using outside plugins |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 18:50 | savant | unfortunately this is not available in 1.2.x or 1.3 |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 18:50 | savant | and then tell the AuthComponent to use that whenever it tries to Authenticate a user |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 18:50 | savant | ideally, i could specify a function in my User model, say User::login() |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 18:49 | savant | which is okay, but the AuthComponent doesn't allow one to override HOW the user is found |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 18:49 | savant | well the way the bakery works, it pulls in data from related models |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 18:48 | PhpNut | savant: you talking about return $this->Session->read('User'); ? |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 18:48 | savant | im just hesitant to use plugins outside of the CakePHP core, like Authsome instead of AuthComponent |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 18:48 | PhpNut | I wrote most of the user model code |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 18:48 | savant | haha |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 18:48 | savant | i got hacky and added in replacements to functions in the AppModel, so most of it works now (I've not touched the admin functions) but I want to remove all of it |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 18:48 | PhpNut | btw I did not write that code :) |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 18:48 | Predominant | Sorry about the delay there |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 18:48 | Predominant | savant: I'll get this stuff together for you now. |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 18:47 | savant | but it breaks all over the place in 1.3 |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 18:47 | savant | the bakery runs mostly fine in 1.2.x |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 18:47 | savant | PhpNut: yeah I saw. it took me a while to realize that |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 18:46 | PhpNut | there are different levels of users in the bakery |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 18:46 | Predominant | Perhaps your frustrations / issues, savant, could be channeled into productive discussion about architecture, rather than bitching about it on Twitter. |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 18:45 | savant | feel free to do so, my code is in the remaster branch at github.com/josegonzalez/bakery |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 18:45 | PhpNut | auth was not in 1.0 ;) |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 18:45 | savant | yes no problem |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 18:45 | PhpNut | I might just take time to review some of your current code and release my anguish of it on twitter, you like that idea? :) |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 18:44 | savant | sorry |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 18:44 | PhpNut | So I take your bashing on twitter a little personal |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 18:44 | savant | oh well |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 18:44 | savant | if only it were more similar to how AuthComponent works |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 18:43 | savant | hahahah |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 18:43 | savant | refactoring it to use AuthComponent is proving to be a pain |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 18:43 | PhpNut | and FYI I wrote _checkPerms if I remember correctly |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 18:43 | savant | thats a long time ago |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 18:43 | PhpNut | yes |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 18:43 | savant | damn |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 18:43 | savant | oh shit really |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 18:43 | PhpNut | savant you do realize the bakery code was wrote before 1.0 was stable right? |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 00:37 | savant | haha okay |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 00:36 | Predominant | Need some merge action |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 00:36 | Predominant | I have some on my iPad, and some on my macbook here |
| # | Apr 13th 2010, 00:36 | savant | Predominant: do you happen to have the notes for Bakery 2.0 somewhere? |
| # | Apr 12th 2010, 19:15 | savant | ugh |
| # | Apr 12th 2010, 19:15 | savant | ive also got to fix this base64 decoding issue |
| # | Apr 12th 2010, 19:15 | ADmad | ok will try and get it for you.. also ask Larry when you see him around |
| # | Apr 12th 2010, 19:13 | savant | nope |
| # | Apr 12th 2010, 19:11 | ADmad | the repo doesnt have the theme ? |
| # | Apr 12th 2010, 19:09 | savant | Is there any way I can have a copy so I can modify it so that I know it works? I'm fine not shoving it into the git repository if there are trademark issues (i'll gitignore it or something), I just want to make sure there aren't any silly issues I have to deal with later |
| # | Apr 12th 2010, 19:08 | savant | install |
| # | Apr 12th 2010, 19:08 | savant | So I remember there being some mention of a theme being used for the official bakery |
| # | Apr 12th 2010, 17:39 | savant | I've got the bakery mostly running in 1.3! woop! |
| # | Apr 12th 2010, 01:15 | savant | Predominant: whenever you get the chance, could you forward the Bakery rewrite docs/notes that you mentioned before? If it's in a file and not online somewhere, just email it to jose@savant.be. thanks. |
| # | Apr 12th 2010, 00:04 | savant | im going to try using svn2git to import the repository instead so i can maintain any tags and branches, and then rebase that onto the current bakery fork I have |
| # | Apr 12th 2010, 00:03 | savant | oh wow, i didn't know the bakery was that old. it still uses thtml files. This is going to be fun :) |
| # | Apr 11th 2010, 23:56 | savant | ah fair enough |
| # | Apr 11th 2010, 23:56 | Predominant | Well, seems like a good place to put an svn-git result |
| # | Apr 11th 2010, 23:56 | savant | i have a fork of the bakery |
| # | Apr 11th 2010, 23:56 | Predominant | savant: You probably should hav forked the bakery, and comitted there |
| # | Apr 11th 2010, 23:55 | savant | thanks for the dump and links, PhpNut and Predominant |
| # | Apr 11th 2010, 23:55 | savant | im going to just do all the work in a topic branch, but master will stay as is until the app is fully functional |
| # | Apr 11th 2010, 23:55 | savant | so umm, i've imported the current code to http://github.com/josegonzalez/patisserie in case anyone was interested |
| # | Apr 11th 2010, 23:37 | savant | oh hey, im gitting the repository! |
| # | Apr 11th 2010, 23:29 | Predominant | The only hacking I do is with processing. |
| # | Apr 11th 2010, 23:28 | savant | sorry i hack at code. im not a very good engineer |
| # | Apr 11th 2010, 23:28 | Predominant | We engineer and develop it. |
| # | Apr 11th 2010, 23:28 | Predominant | We don't hack code. |
| # | Apr 11th 2010, 23:28 | savant | regardless, i just want to make the code more hackable so that others can jump in and work on cakephp code |
| # | Apr 11th 2010, 23:27 | savant | fair enough. either way works |
| # | Apr 11th 2010, 23:27 | Predominant | I'd utilise caching |
| # | Apr 11th 2010, 23:27 | savant | why not |
| # | Apr 11th 2010, 23:27 | Predominant | I don't know that storing HTML in the database is a great idea. |
| # | Apr 11th 2010, 23:27 | PhpNut | before you get too crazy make sure you check in this channel what plans are for it |
| # | Apr 11th 2010, 23:27 | savant | and also store html in the database so that it does not need to be regenerated |
| # | Apr 11th 2010, 23:26 | Predominant | No point planning to rewrite with no objectives in mind. |