| # |
Apr 13th 2010, 18:47 |
savant |
but it breaks all over the place in 1.3 |
| # |
Apr 13th 2010, 18:47 |
savant |
the bakery runs mostly fine in 1.2.x |
| # |
Apr 13th 2010, 18:47 |
savant |
PhpNut: yeah I saw. it took me a while to realize that |
| # |
Apr 13th 2010, 18:46 |
PhpNut |
there are different levels of users in the bakery |
| # |
Apr 13th 2010, 18:46 |
Predominant |
Perhaps your frustrations / issues, savant, could be channeled into productive discussion about architecture, rather than bitching about it on Twitter. |
| # |
Apr 13th 2010, 18:45 |
savant |
feel free to do so, my code is in the remaster branch at github.com/josegonzalez/bakery |
| # |
Apr 13th 2010, 18:45 |
PhpNut |
auth was not in 1.0 ;) |
| # |
Apr 13th 2010, 18:45 |
savant |
yes no problem |
| # |
Apr 13th 2010, 18:45 |
PhpNut |
I might just take time to review some of your current code and release my anguish of it on twitter, you like that idea? :) |
| # |
Apr 13th 2010, 18:44 |
savant |
sorry |
| # |
Apr 13th 2010, 18:44 |
PhpNut |
So I take your bashing on twitter a little personal |
| # |
Apr 13th 2010, 18:44 |
savant |
oh well |
| # |
Apr 13th 2010, 18:44 |
savant |
if only it were more similar to how AuthComponent works |
| # |
Apr 13th 2010, 18:43 |
savant |
hahahah |
| # |
Apr 13th 2010, 18:43 |
savant |
refactoring it to use AuthComponent is proving to be a pain |
| # |
Apr 13th 2010, 18:43 |
PhpNut |
and FYI I wrote _checkPerms if I remember correctly |
| # |
Apr 13th 2010, 18:43 |
savant |
thats a long time ago |
| # |
Apr 13th 2010, 18:43 |
PhpNut |
yes |
| # |
Apr 13th 2010, 18:43 |
savant |
damn |
| # |
Apr 13th 2010, 18:43 |
savant |
oh shit really |
| # |
Apr 13th 2010, 18:43 |
PhpNut |
savant you do realize the bakery code was wrote before 1.0 was stable right? |
| # |
Apr 13th 2010, 00:37 |
savant |
haha okay |
| # |
Apr 13th 2010, 00:36 |
Predominant |
Need some merge action |
| # |
Apr 13th 2010, 00:36 |
Predominant |
I have some on my iPad, and some on my macbook here |
| # |
Apr 13th 2010, 00:36 |
savant |
Predominant: do you happen to have the notes for Bakery 2.0 somewhere? |
| # |
Apr 12th 2010, 19:15 |
savant |
ugh |
| # |
Apr 12th 2010, 19:15 |
savant |
ive also got to fix this base64 decoding issue |
| # |
Apr 12th 2010, 19:15 |
ADmad |
ok will try and get it for you.. also ask Larry when you see him around |
| # |
Apr 12th 2010, 19:13 |
savant |
nope |
| # |
Apr 12th 2010, 19:11 |
ADmad |
the repo doesnt have the theme ? |
| # |
Apr 12th 2010, 19:09 |
savant |
Is there any way I can have a copy so I can modify it so that I know it works? I'm fine not shoving it into the git repository if there are trademark issues (i'll gitignore it or something), I just want to make sure there aren't any silly issues I have to deal with later |
| # |
Apr 12th 2010, 19:08 |
savant |
install |
| # |
Apr 12th 2010, 19:08 |
savant |
So I remember there being some mention of a theme being used for the official bakery |
| # |
Apr 12th 2010, 17:39 |
savant |
I've got the bakery mostly running in 1.3! woop! |
| # |
Apr 12th 2010, 01:15 |
savant |
Predominant: whenever you get the chance, could you forward the Bakery rewrite docs/notes that you mentioned before? If it's in a file and not online somewhere, just email it to jose@savant.be. thanks. |
| # |
Apr 12th 2010, 00:04 |
savant |
im going to try using svn2git to import the repository instead so i can maintain any tags and branches, and then rebase that onto the current bakery fork I have |
| # |
Apr 12th 2010, 00:03 |
savant |
oh wow, i didn't know the bakery was that old. it still uses thtml files. This is going to be fun :) |
| # |
Apr 11th 2010, 23:56 |
savant |
ah fair enough |
| # |
Apr 11th 2010, 23:56 |
Predominant |
Well, seems like a good place to put an svn-git result |
| # |
Apr 11th 2010, 23:56 |
savant |
i have a fork of the bakery |
| # |
Apr 11th 2010, 23:56 |
Predominant |
savant: You probably should hav forked the bakery, and comitted there |