| # |
Apr 12th 2010, 19:08 |
savant |
install |
| # |
Apr 12th 2010, 19:08 |
savant |
So I remember there being some mention of a theme being used for the official bakery |
| # |
Apr 12th 2010, 17:39 |
savant |
I've got the bakery mostly running in 1.3! woop! |
| # |
Apr 12th 2010, 01:15 |
savant |
Predominant: whenever you get the chance, could you forward the Bakery rewrite docs/notes that you mentioned before? If it's in a file and not online somewhere, just email it to jose@savant.be. thanks. |
| # |
Apr 12th 2010, 00:04 |
savant |
im going to try using svn2git to import the repository instead so i can maintain any tags and branches, and then rebase that onto the current bakery fork I have |
| # |
Apr 12th 2010, 00:03 |
savant |
oh wow, i didn't know the bakery was that old. it still uses thtml files. This is going to be fun :) |
| # |
Apr 11th 2010, 23:56 |
savant |
ah fair enough |
| # |
Apr 11th 2010, 23:56 |
Predominant |
Well, seems like a good place to put an svn-git result |
| # |
Apr 11th 2010, 23:56 |
savant |
i have a fork of the bakery |
| # |
Apr 11th 2010, 23:56 |
Predominant |
savant: You probably should hav forked the bakery, and comitted there |
| # |
Apr 11th 2010, 23:55 |
savant |
thanks for the dump and links, PhpNut and Predominant |
| # |
Apr 11th 2010, 23:55 |
savant |
im going to just do all the work in a topic branch, but master will stay as is until the app is fully functional |
| # |
Apr 11th 2010, 23:55 |
savant |
so umm, i've imported the current code to http://github.com/josegonzalez/patisserie in case anyone was interested |
| # |
Apr 11th 2010, 23:37 |
savant |
oh hey, im gitting the repository! |
| # |
Apr 11th 2010, 23:29 |
Predominant |
The only hacking I do is with processing. |
| # |
Apr 11th 2010, 23:28 |
savant |
sorry i hack at code. im not a very good engineer |
| # |
Apr 11th 2010, 23:28 |
Predominant |
We engineer and develop it. |
| # |
Apr 11th 2010, 23:28 |
Predominant |
We don't hack code. |
| # |
Apr 11th 2010, 23:28 |
savant |
regardless, i just want to make the code more hackable so that others can jump in and work on cakephp code |
| # |
Apr 11th 2010, 23:27 |
savant |
fair enough. either way works |
| # |
Apr 11th 2010, 23:27 |
Predominant |
I'd utilise caching |
| # |
Apr 11th 2010, 23:27 |
savant |
why not |
| # |
Apr 11th 2010, 23:27 |
Predominant |
I don't know that storing HTML in the database is a great idea. |
| # |
Apr 11th 2010, 23:27 |
PhpNut |
before you get too crazy make sure you check in this channel what plans are for it |
| # |
Apr 11th 2010, 23:27 |
savant |
and also store html in the database so that it does not need to be regenerated |
| # |
Apr 11th 2010, 23:26 |
Predominant |
No point planning to rewrite with no objectives in mind. |
| # |
Apr 11th 2010, 23:26 |
Predominant |
I guess I should dig up the notes for objectives for Bakery 2.0 |
| # |
Apr 11th 2010, 23:26 |
savant |
i'll actually try and write a parser for the bbcode to change it to textile or creole |
| # |
Apr 11th 2010, 23:26 |
PhpNut |
cool |
| # |
Apr 11th 2010, 23:26 |
savant |
I will attempt a rewrite with the same data |
| # |
Apr 11th 2010, 23:26 |
PhpNut |
savant it it going to be a rewrite maintaining current data |
| # |
Apr 11th 2010, 23:25 |
Predominant |
There was a huge movement during CakeFest Berlin to do a rewrite, but that energy died out pretty quickly. |
| # |
Apr 11th 2010, 23:25 |
Predominant |
Thats how old it was |
| # |
Apr 11th 2010, 23:25 |
savant |
will the current bakery code be pushed to github at any point in the future? |
| # |
Apr 11th 2010, 23:25 |
Predominant |
Yeah, looks like the bakery still uses the cakeforge as the origin. Still svn based. |
| # |
Apr 11th 2010, 23:25 |
PhpNut |
svn checkout --username developername https://svn.cakeforge.org/svn/bake |
| # |
Apr 11th 2010, 23:25 |
PhpNut |
or do it the old fashion way |
| # |
Apr 11th 2010, 23:24 |
savant |
mhm |
| # |
Apr 11th 2010, 23:24 |
Predominant |
just click the "continue anyway" or other relevant button to continue through. |
| # |
Apr 11th 2010, 23:24 |
savant |
I know. it does not, just saying that Chromium does not like them |
| # |
Apr 11th 2010, 23:23 |
Predominant |
That should not affect your ability to view the pages. |