| # |
Jul 19th 2009, 14:51 |
markstory |
do you happen to know the function that reads ini files? |
| # |
Jul 19th 2009, 14:51 |
pointlessjon |
guess i got lucky as you probably have some good ideas |
| # |
Jul 19th 2009, 14:50 |
markstory |
oh ok |
| # |
Jul 19th 2009, 14:50 |
pointlessjon |
I just had some mockups for an idea and was excited to get some feedback is all |
| # |
Jul 19th 2009, 14:50 |
pointlessjon |
hey mark |
| # |
Jul 19th 2009, 14:49 |
markstory |
pointlessjon: wassup? |
| # |
Jul 19th 2009, 13:29 |
pointlessjon |
anyone breathing? |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 19:28 |
pointlessjon |
Seems more like a tools/tips kind of thing |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 19:27 |
pointlessjon |
Also, what do you think about moving snippets to the articles category? |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 19:23 |
pointlessjon |
Shells - how do theyfit into the current content categorization? |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:38 |
Phally |
yeah, but there is an existing users table in the way |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:37 |
alkemann |
i gotta go. laters |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:37 |
alkemann |
Phally: ^ |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:36 |
alkemann |
any extra fields goes in a users_profile table |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:36 |
alkemann |
plugin users table is the only users table we need |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:27 |
Phally |
i will make two schema files, one that only contains a minimum users table and one for the messaging tables |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:26 |
Phally |
i was thinking the same |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:25 |
ADmad |
but i still think we should have a seperate schema for the plugin which contains the bare minimum tables and fields it needs |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:25 |
Phally |
yeah, i think that would be best |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:24 |
ADmad |
so i guess the users table stays in app's schema |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:21 |
Phally |
oh, schema for the plugin would be different then the schema for the app, because the plugin would only need users(id, username, password, email, etc), while current the users table has some more fields, it would be a bit app specific |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:16 |
Phally |
perfect |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:15 |
Phally |
ADmad: oh sorry that was what i meant |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:13 |
ADmad |
Phally: inside "sql" folder under here http://thechaw.com/bakery/source/branches/usersplugin/plugins/users/config |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:12 |
Phally |
in APP/users/config/sql? |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:12 |
ADmad |
and put it inside plugin |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:11 |
Phally |
very well |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:11 |
alkemann |
Phally: yea put all plugin stuff in seperate schema file |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:11 |
ADmad |
yup |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:11 |
Phally |
ADmad: sounds good though, having it separated |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:11 |
Phally |
ADmad: that means extracting the users schema out of the current schema.php file too |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:10 |
ADmad |
*related |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:10 |
ADmad |
Phally: think would be better if we kept tables relates to users plugin in a separate schema file |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:05 |
Phally |
alkemann: messaging tables in the schema.php file or a separated file? (i never use schema's like this) |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 14:17 |
ADmad |
think this can be published too http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/how-to-add-autocomplete-to-eclipse-aptana although not sure if "tutorials" is the right category for it.. "general interest" would be better imo |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 14:12 |
Phally |
aight |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 14:11 |
alkemann |
Phally: looks good |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 14:09 |
Martz |
gotcha |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 14:09 |
ADmad |
Martz: yeah thats the recommened course of action afaik... unless we have asked for some trivial change its better to flag it as draft (or deleted in case something is total crap) so that it goes off the pending list.. |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 14:07 |
Martz |
ADmad: did you mark the file uploader as "draft"? Is that something I should've done after my comment? |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 14:06 |
Martz|alt |
nice ^^ |