| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:25 |
ADmad |
but i still think we should have a seperate schema for the plugin which contains the bare minimum tables and fields it needs |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:25 |
Phally |
yeah, i think that would be best |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:24 |
ADmad |
so i guess the users table stays in app's schema |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:21 |
Phally |
oh, schema for the plugin would be different then the schema for the app, because the plugin would only need users(id, username, password, email, etc), while current the users table has some more fields, it would be a bit app specific |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:16 |
Phally |
perfect |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:15 |
Phally |
ADmad: oh sorry that was what i meant |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:13 |
ADmad |
Phally: inside "sql" folder under here http://thechaw.com/bakery/source/branches/usersplugin/plugins/users/config |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:12 |
Phally |
in APP/users/config/sql? |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:12 |
ADmad |
and put it inside plugin |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:11 |
Phally |
very well |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:11 |
alkemann |
Phally: yea put all plugin stuff in seperate schema file |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:11 |
ADmad |
yup |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:11 |
Phally |
ADmad: sounds good though, having it separated |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:11 |
Phally |
ADmad: that means extracting the users schema out of the current schema.php file too |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:10 |
ADmad |
*related |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:10 |
ADmad |
Phally: think would be better if we kept tables relates to users plugin in a separate schema file |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 15:05 |
Phally |
alkemann: messaging tables in the schema.php file or a separated file? (i never use schema's like this) |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 14:17 |
ADmad |
think this can be published too http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/how-to-add-autocomplete-to-eclipse-aptana although not sure if "tutorials" is the right category for it.. "general interest" would be better imo |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 14:12 |
Phally |
aight |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 14:11 |
alkemann |
Phally: looks good |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 14:09 |
Martz |
gotcha |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 14:09 |
ADmad |
Martz: yeah thats the recommened course of action afaik... unless we have asked for some trivial change its better to flag it as draft (or deleted in case something is total crap) so that it goes off the pending list.. |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 14:07 |
Martz |
ADmad: did you mark the file uploader as "draft"? Is that something I should've done after my comment? |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 14:06 |
Martz|alt |
nice ^^ |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 14:05 |
ADmad |
Martz|alt: yup i flagged the file uploader one which you already commented upon so that its off the pending list.. also gave feedback for this one http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/feed-aggregator#comment-4645 |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 14:05 |
Martz|alt |
submitted a few |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 14:05 |
Martz|alt |
ADmad: have you dealt with any other articles from milesj? |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 13:47 |
Phally |
) |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 13:47 |
Phally |
very well, take your time :0 |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 13:47 |
alkemann |
not yet. in a few min |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 13:46 |
Phally |
alkemann: did you read http://thechaw.com/bakery/wiki/spec/users/personal_messaging too? |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 13:37 |
ADmad |
i c |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 13:37 |
Phally |
http://irc.cakephp.org/logs/link/894877#message894887 |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 13:36 |
ADmad |
"Personal messaging will become part of the users plug-in" ? |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 13:35 |
ADmad |
checking |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 13:35 |
Phally |
ADmad: what do you think about this: http://thechaw.com/bakery/wiki/spec/users/personal_messaging |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 13:16 |
ADmad |
this should be a datasource not component http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/feed-aggregator so i intend to ask the author to refactor.. anyone want to share an opinion on it ? |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 13:04 |
Phally |
yo |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 13:04 |
Phally |
i was trying to save an empty page to edit further, but got a validation error on the content field, then it must have resetted the title or something |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 13:03 |
alkemann |
afk |
| # |
Jul 18th 2009, 13:03 |
Phally |
oh it is gone :) |