Log message #898854

# At Username Text
# Jul 19th 2009, 15:15 alkemann _
# Jul 19th 2009, 15:15 alkemann markdown is the little brother of markstory_
# Jul 19th 2009, 15:14 markstory markdown fail on thechaw.
# Jul 19th 2009, 15:12 alkemann pointlessjon: i like it
# Jul 19th 2009, 15:12 alkemann back
# Jul 19th 2009, 15:12 Phally negative
# Jul 19th 2009, 15:11 alkemann thechaw down_
# Jul 19th 2009, 14:52 markstory found it :)
# Jul 19th 2009, 14:52 markstory parse_ini_file :)
# Jul 19th 2009, 14:52 pointlessjon i don't know the function :(
# Jul 19th 2009, 14:52 pointlessjon http://thechaw.com/bakery/tickets/view/7
# Jul 19th 2009, 14:52 pointlessjon a portion of it anyhow
# Jul 19th 2009, 14:52 pointlessjon yeah
# Jul 19th 2009, 14:51 markstory is this for the bakery redesign?
# Jul 19th 2009, 14:51 markstory do you happen to know the function that reads ini files?
# Jul 19th 2009, 14:51 pointlessjon guess i got lucky as you probably have some good ideas
# Jul 19th 2009, 14:50 markstory oh ok
# Jul 19th 2009, 14:50 pointlessjon I just had some mockups for an idea and was excited to get some feedback is all
# Jul 19th 2009, 14:50 pointlessjon hey mark
# Jul 19th 2009, 14:49 markstory pointlessjon: wassup?
# Jul 19th 2009, 13:29 pointlessjon anyone breathing?
# Jul 18th 2009, 19:28 pointlessjon Seems more like a tools/tips kind of thing
# Jul 18th 2009, 19:27 pointlessjon Also, what do you think about moving snippets to the articles category?
# Jul 18th 2009, 19:23 pointlessjon Shells - how do theyfit into the current content categorization?
# Jul 18th 2009, 15:38 Phally yeah, but there is an existing users table in the way
# Jul 18th 2009, 15:37 alkemann i gotta go. laters
# Jul 18th 2009, 15:37 alkemann Phally: ^
# Jul 18th 2009, 15:36 alkemann any extra fields goes in a users_profile table
# Jul 18th 2009, 15:36 alkemann plugin users table is the only users table we need
# Jul 18th 2009, 15:27 Phally i will make two schema files, one that only contains a minimum users table and one for the messaging tables
# Jul 18th 2009, 15:26 Phally i was thinking the same
# Jul 18th 2009, 15:25 ADmad but i still think we should have a seperate schema for the plugin which contains the bare minimum tables and fields it needs
# Jul 18th 2009, 15:25 Phally yeah, i think that would be best
# Jul 18th 2009, 15:24 ADmad so i guess the users table stays in app's schema
# Jul 18th 2009, 15:21 Phally oh, schema for the plugin would be different then the schema for the app, because the plugin would only need users(id, username, password, email, etc), while current the users table has some more fields, it would be a bit app specific
# Jul 18th 2009, 15:16 Phally perfect
# Jul 18th 2009, 15:15 Phally ADmad: oh sorry that was what i meant
# Jul 18th 2009, 15:13 ADmad Phally: inside "sql" folder under here http://thechaw.com/bakery/source/branches/usersplugin/plugins/users/config
# Jul 18th 2009, 15:12 Phally in APP/users/config/sql?
# Jul 18th 2009, 15:12 ADmad and put it inside plugin
# Jul 18th 2009, 15:11 Phally very well