| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:40 |
techno-geek |
I still would rather get cola working in eclipse |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:39 |
ProLoser|Work |
only reason i ask is cuz i thought it would be helpful if you guys knew about this: etherpad.com |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:38 |
ProLoser|Work |
or anyone know? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:38 |
ProLoser|Work |
gwoo or markstory? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:38 |
ProLoser|Work |
if anyone knows? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:37 |
ProLoser|Work |
who gave the speech on 2 person programming btw? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:37 |
ProLoser|Work |
i still say we get more people to work on this though |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:36 |
ProLoser|Work |
but it does decrease plugin encapsulated modularity |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:36 |
ProLoser|Work |
i understand, only reason why i'd consider making it 1 whole plugin package is you can call the pieces and use them individually out of the package, without even using the package |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:35 |
techno-geek |
let people pick exactly what functionality they want |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:35 |
techno-geek |
Id rather bundle everything separately |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:35 |
ProLoser|Work |
which works for me too :) |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:34 |
ProLoser|Work |
unless all this is going together in 1 plugin, along with the session component and helper |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:34 |
ProLoser|Work |
i like that appraoch, and those can be bundled into another plugin |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:34 |
ProLoser|Work |
lemme know when you got that ready, if it's 1 method and all of it simply interacts with authorize i may just take the time personally to move it into datasources + behavior |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:33 |
techno-geek |
anyway back to work |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:33 |
ProLoser|Work |
okay |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:32 |
techno-geek |
it just has a processPayment($data = array()) method |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:32 |
techno-geek |
yes |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:32 |
techno-geek |
just got to make sure its worth the time |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:32 |
ProLoser|Work |
but it's still a component right? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:32 |
techno-geek |
we can evolve it anyway we see fit |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:31 |
ProLoser|Work |
like the datasources+behavior approach |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:30 |
ProLoser|Work |
so we don't want to create a common pass-through for all the payment gateways? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:30 |
ProLoser|Work |
this one: http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/authorize-net-aim-integration-component ? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:30 |
techno-geek |
well I also standardized the input so that it works in the way that would be expected from the cart component |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:29 |
ProLoser|Work |
that's all? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:29 |
techno-geek |
I can probably get it to you later too |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:29 |
techno-geek |
I am using the Authorize.net component from the bakery, except I modified it to remove some errors and add a little bit extra logic to it for test mode, etc. |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:28 |
ProLoser|Work |
when can i see the payment gateway code? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:28 |
techno-geek |
its coming along well. I ran it by a co-worker and he was happy with our ideas as well |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:28 |
techno-geek |
yeah. just the re-work with the new array structure |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:27 |
ProLoser|Work |
the new component? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:27 |
techno-geek |
Ill have this updated code for you in the next couple hours |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:27 |
ProLoser|Work |
techno-geek: alrighty, all i know is it was there in the beginning, you didn't make it clear how far into our code it would get into so i was confused |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:26 |
ProLoser|Work |
you were asking what's the best way to handle designing plugins, and people were telling you to just let them use the built in cake plugin base |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:26 |
techno-geek |
its just for the base app. nothing that concerns you since you wont be using it |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:26 |
ProLoser|Work |
you were working on something like that in the beginning, no? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:26 |
techno-geek |
custom plugin designing api? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:25 |
ProLoser|Work |
did we let go of that in exchange for a common data array? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:25 |
ProLoser|Work |
or whatever it was |