| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 12:13 |
Phally |
_nate_: i wasn't aware of that method (while looking at the other test cases), i'll see what i can do |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 12:13 |
kuja |
when did this channel get so many people? o_O |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 12:13 |
kuja |
sup |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 12:13 |
_nate_ |
hehe |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 12:12 |
markstory |
ACTION was just kidding |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 12:12 |
markstory |
actually refactor the whole test while you're at it :p |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 12:11 |
_nate_ |
can you rewrite this test using assertTags? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 12:11 |
_nate_ |
Phally: https://trac.cakephp.org/attachment/ticket/6516/paginator.test.php.diff |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 10:25 |
ProLoser|Work |
since acl would be more versatile |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 10:25 |
ProLoser|Work |
or at least auth + acl |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 10:24 |
ProLoser|Work |
is it definately a bad idea to bundle auth into a plugin? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 10:05 |
ProLoser|Work |
what do u need it for? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 10:03 |
gravyface |
where's the bakery 1.0 source? svn? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:40 |
ProLoser|Work |
no real os/specs/browser limitation |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:40 |
ProLoser|Work |
but etherpad is a very nice fall back |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:40 |
ProLoser|Work |
i definately agree |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:40 |
techno-geek |
seems a lot more useful |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:40 |
techno-geek |
I still would rather get cola working in eclipse |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:39 |
ProLoser|Work |
only reason i ask is cuz i thought it would be helpful if you guys knew about this: etherpad.com |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:38 |
ProLoser|Work |
or anyone know? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:38 |
ProLoser|Work |
gwoo or markstory? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:38 |
ProLoser|Work |
if anyone knows? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:37 |
ProLoser|Work |
who gave the speech on 2 person programming btw? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:37 |
ProLoser|Work |
i still say we get more people to work on this though |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:36 |
ProLoser|Work |
but it does decrease plugin encapsulated modularity |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:36 |
ProLoser|Work |
i understand, only reason why i'd consider making it 1 whole plugin package is you can call the pieces and use them individually out of the package, without even using the package |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:35 |
techno-geek |
let people pick exactly what functionality they want |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:35 |
techno-geek |
Id rather bundle everything separately |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:35 |
ProLoser|Work |
which works for me too :) |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:34 |
ProLoser|Work |
unless all this is going together in 1 plugin, along with the session component and helper |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:34 |
ProLoser|Work |
i like that appraoch, and those can be bundled into another plugin |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:34 |
ProLoser|Work |
lemme know when you got that ready, if it's 1 method and all of it simply interacts with authorize i may just take the time personally to move it into datasources + behavior |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:33 |
techno-geek |
anyway back to work |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:33 |
ProLoser|Work |
okay |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:32 |
techno-geek |
it just has a processPayment($data = array()) method |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:32 |
techno-geek |
yes |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:32 |
techno-geek |
just got to make sure its worth the time |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:32 |
ProLoser|Work |
but it's still a component right? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:32 |
techno-geek |
we can evolve it anyway we see fit |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:31 |
ProLoser|Work |
like the datasources+behavior approach |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:30 |
ProLoser|Work |
so we don't want to create a common pass-through for all the payment gateways? |