| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:33 |
techno-geek |
anyway back to work |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:33 |
ProLoser|Work |
okay |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:32 |
techno-geek |
it just has a processPayment($data = array()) method |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:32 |
techno-geek |
yes |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:32 |
techno-geek |
just got to make sure its worth the time |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:32 |
ProLoser|Work |
but it's still a component right? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:32 |
techno-geek |
we can evolve it anyway we see fit |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:31 |
ProLoser|Work |
like the datasources+behavior approach |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:30 |
ProLoser|Work |
so we don't want to create a common pass-through for all the payment gateways? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:30 |
ProLoser|Work |
this one: http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/authorize-net-aim-integration-component ? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:30 |
techno-geek |
well I also standardized the input so that it works in the way that would be expected from the cart component |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:29 |
ProLoser|Work |
that's all? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:29 |
techno-geek |
I can probably get it to you later too |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:29 |
techno-geek |
I am using the Authorize.net component from the bakery, except I modified it to remove some errors and add a little bit extra logic to it for test mode, etc. |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:28 |
ProLoser|Work |
when can i see the payment gateway code? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:28 |
techno-geek |
its coming along well. I ran it by a co-worker and he was happy with our ideas as well |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:28 |
techno-geek |
yeah. just the re-work with the new array structure |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:27 |
ProLoser|Work |
the new component? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:27 |
techno-geek |
Ill have this updated code for you in the next couple hours |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:27 |
ProLoser|Work |
techno-geek: alrighty, all i know is it was there in the beginning, you didn't make it clear how far into our code it would get into so i was confused |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:26 |
ProLoser|Work |
you were asking what's the best way to handle designing plugins, and people were telling you to just let them use the built in cake plugin base |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:26 |
techno-geek |
its just for the base app. nothing that concerns you since you wont be using it |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:26 |
ProLoser|Work |
you were working on something like that in the beginning, no? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:26 |
techno-geek |
custom plugin designing api? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:25 |
ProLoser|Work |
did we let go of that in exchange for a common data array? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:25 |
ProLoser|Work |
or whatever it was |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:25 |
ProLoser|Work |
what about the custom plugin designing api |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:25 |
ProLoser|Work |
i remember that |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:25 |
techno-geek |
*anywhere |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:25 |
techno-geek |
You already forgot our discussion the other day, when I said all of the plugins can be used anyway |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:24 |
ProLoser|Work |
which made no sense to me |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:24 |
ProLoser|Work |
techno-geek: iunno, all i saw was some of your triggers code and was concerned we'd have to start using that in our code |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:24 |
techno-geek |
you are like moving in reverse on our whole convo :P |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:24 |
ProLoser|Work |
i just wanted the 'base app' to be the plugin as a whole |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:24 |
ProLoser|Work |
oh the triggers aren't for that? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:24 |
techno-geek |
just worry about the re-usable parts we are working on |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:23 |
techno-geek |
ProLoser|Work, you need to let that go. you will never see the event triggers I designed :D |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:23 |
ProLoser|Work |
one of the talks goes over using the already existing built-in triggers |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:23 |
ProLoser|Work |
but i don't want to design a 'base app' or set of custom triggers |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:23 |
ProLoser|Work |
i'm fine with packaging everything in plugins |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 09:22 |
ProLoser|Work |
techno-geek: bah that i was assuming we'd do |