| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:08 |
jperras |
yeah I've read the wiki |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:08 |
AD7six |
to bring you up to speed with what we discussed, it was basically how to be able to add these sort of things to articles: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BIAS#Related_cleanup_templates |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:07 |
jperras |
mockups, that is. use cases, I believe someone else was doing those. |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:07 |
jperras |
workin' on it. |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:01 |
alkemann |
atm we are waiting for the mockups and use cases, but it is taking some time, so just brainstorming on other aspects really |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:01 |
alkemann |
no really. it's been a bit random |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:00 |
AD7six |
coolio. do you guys have a meeting schedule btw I don't see anything on the wiki |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 11:59 |
alkemann |
no. atm just in the brainstorming phase i think.. hopefully we will have a round of input before finalizing |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 11:57 |
AD7six |
did you have a name in mind for these notices/elements/flags? |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 11:56 |
AD7six |
cool a rather insignificant change at this stage. |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 11:54 |
alkemann |
ok i see where ur going now. yes i agree |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 11:54 |
AD7six |
we already have a field, but it's called deprecated (which is the only reason we've currently got to hide articles and maybe the only reason we'll ever have) |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 11:49 |
alkemann |
since all content is moved to sub model pages, i think that this is the sort of thing we can use the main model for yes |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 11:47 |
AD7six |
I think show_in_index (or other similar descriptive name) should be the field on the article table - i.e. disassociate the effect from the reason. What do you think? |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 11:46 |
AD7six |
alkemann: regarding deprecated, not showing in the index, and the other flag/notice thing were were talking about: |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 13:33 |
_nate_ |
thanks |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 13:33 |
_nate_ |
huzzah |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 13:33 |
jperras |
AD7six: actually, it was #1 |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 13:33 |
jperras |
_nate_: try now |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 13:32 |
_nate_ |
AD7six: it was one of the first articles, so, probably |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 13:32 |
AD7six |
was there an edit-makes-new-article bug at one time then? |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 13:32 |
_nate_ |
ACTION smacks forehead |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 13:32 |
jperras |
oy |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 13:32 |
_nate_ |
now the remaining one is inaccessible as well |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 13:32 |
_nate_ |
strange |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 13:32 |
_nate_ |
thanks |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 13:31 |
jperras |
_nate_: http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/search/2/LDAP |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 13:31 |
jperras |
perhaps. i'll try un-publishing older ones |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 13:31 |
_nate_ |
perhaps it was duplicated due to an old bug |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 13:31 |
_nate_ |
...huh |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 13:31 |
jperras |
_nate_: it's showing up as article #1, #314 and #417 |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 13:23 |
ADmad |
strange one |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 13:22 |
_nate_ |
that's an issue |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 13:21 |
_nate_ |
the same article shows up 3 times |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 13:21 |
_nate_ |
http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/search/2/LDAP |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 10:04 |
ADmad |
heh |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 10:04 |
_nate_ |
you just have to think at it |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 10:04 |
_nate_ |
that will do all your work for you |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 10:04 |
_nate_ |
* Matrix |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 10:04 |
_nate_ |
Drupal + the Drupal module that integrates with the Construct program from the Matric |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 10:03 |
ADmad |
i blame cake for making me lazy |