| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:31 |
AD7six |
re (sorta) fixed - authors can delete comments (I think) |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:29 |
AD7six |
wiki page saved btw |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:29 |
AD7six |
on the wiki, or with the bakery itself? |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:20 |
alkemann |
i was thinking of slug rename problem |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:20 |
alkemann |
AD7six: sure |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:20 |
alkemann |
jperras: two of those LDAP articles u talked about are currently in pending. did u need them there or can i softdelete em? |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:19 |
AD7six |
well, it's misleading. name it "markers"? I'm editing it right now anyway |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:18 |
alkemann |
admad correctly pointed out that this isnt moderation, but i think of it as moderation tools.. maybe not worth the hassle of rename? |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:18 |
AD7six |
I'm adding a note to articles/moderation regarding deprecated -> marker + taken out of indexes. |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:18 |
alkemann |
please add it here http://thechaw.com/bakery/wiki/spec/articles/moderation |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:18 |
alkemann |
AD7six: no. appearsnot.. |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:16 |
AD7six |
is there a bakery2 mention somewhere of deprecated articles not showing in the index? I wanted to add a note/xref to markers |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:16 |
alkemann |
or maybe i just planed to comment and it fixed itself magically? |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:16 |
AD7six |
what do you mean it's public (no)? |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:16 |
alkemann |
it was pretty messy, i posted some feedback, now its (sorta) fixed, published and my comment gone |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:15 |
alkemann |
any of u know what happened to http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/serializing-find-threaded-data-to-xml |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:09 |
AD7six |
he so goody |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:09 |
jperras |
an entry was made yesterday by alkemann, I believe |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:08 |
AD7six |
oh, I didn't know it was updated. |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:08 |
jperras |
rss feed ;-) |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:08 |
jperras |
yeah I've read the wiki |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:08 |
AD7six |
to bring you up to speed with what we discussed, it was basically how to be able to add these sort of things to articles: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BIAS#Related_cleanup_templates |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:07 |
jperras |
mockups, that is. use cases, I believe someone else was doing those. |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:07 |
jperras |
workin' on it. |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:01 |
alkemann |
atm we are waiting for the mockups and use cases, but it is taking some time, so just brainstorming on other aspects really |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:01 |
alkemann |
no really. it's been a bit random |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:00 |
AD7six |
coolio. do you guys have a meeting schedule btw I don't see anything on the wiki |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 11:59 |
alkemann |
no. atm just in the brainstorming phase i think.. hopefully we will have a round of input before finalizing |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 11:57 |
AD7six |
did you have a name in mind for these notices/elements/flags? |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 11:56 |
AD7six |
cool a rather insignificant change at this stage. |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 11:54 |
alkemann |
ok i see where ur going now. yes i agree |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 11:54 |
AD7six |
we already have a field, but it's called deprecated (which is the only reason we've currently got to hide articles and maybe the only reason we'll ever have) |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 11:49 |
alkemann |
since all content is moved to sub model pages, i think that this is the sort of thing we can use the main model for yes |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 11:47 |
AD7six |
I think show_in_index (or other similar descriptive name) should be the field on the article table - i.e. disassociate the effect from the reason. What do you think? |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 11:46 |
AD7six |
alkemann: regarding deprecated, not showing in the index, and the other flag/notice thing were were talking about: |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 13:33 |
_nate_ |
thanks |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 13:33 |
_nate_ |
huzzah |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 13:33 |
jperras |
AD7six: actually, it was #1 |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 13:33 |
jperras |
_nate_: try now |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 13:32 |
_nate_ |
AD7six: it was one of the first articles, so, probably |
| # |
Mar 12th 2009, 13:32 |
AD7six |
was there an edit-makes-new-article bug at one time then? |