Log message #587198

# At Username Text
# Mar 12th 2009, 13:33 jperras _nate_: try now
# Mar 12th 2009, 13:32 _nate_ AD7six: it was one of the first articles, so, probably
# Mar 12th 2009, 13:32 AD7six was there an edit-makes-new-article bug at one time then?
# Mar 12th 2009, 13:32 _nate_ ACTION smacks forehead
# Mar 12th 2009, 13:32 jperras oy
# Mar 12th 2009, 13:32 _nate_ now the remaining one is inaccessible as well
# Mar 12th 2009, 13:32 _nate_ strange
# Mar 12th 2009, 13:32 _nate_ thanks
# Mar 12th 2009, 13:31 jperras _nate_: http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/search/2/LDAP
# Mar 12th 2009, 13:31 jperras perhaps. i'll try un-publishing older ones
# Mar 12th 2009, 13:31 _nate_ perhaps it was duplicated due to an old bug
# Mar 12th 2009, 13:31 _nate_ ...huh
# Mar 12th 2009, 13:31 jperras _nate_: it's showing up as article #1, #314 and #417
# Mar 12th 2009, 13:23 ADmad strange one
# Mar 12th 2009, 13:22 _nate_ that's an issue
# Mar 12th 2009, 13:21 _nate_ the same article shows up 3 times
# Mar 12th 2009, 13:21 _nate_ http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/search/2/LDAP
# Mar 12th 2009, 10:04 ADmad heh
# Mar 12th 2009, 10:04 _nate_ you just have to think at it
# Mar 12th 2009, 10:04 _nate_ that will do all your work for you
# Mar 12th 2009, 10:04 _nate_ * Matrix
# Mar 12th 2009, 10:04 _nate_ Drupal + the Drupal module that integrates with the Construct program from the Matric
# Mar 12th 2009, 10:03 ADmad i blame cake for making me lazy
# Mar 12th 2009, 10:03 _nate_ only one platform does all your work for you
# Mar 12th 2009, 10:03 _nate_ therein lies the problem
# Mar 12th 2009, 10:03 _nate_ hah
# Mar 12th 2009, 10:02 ADmad yes but i like cake to do my work for me :P
# Mar 12th 2009, 10:02 jperras and it's not difficult to implement a custom rule to do the deep check yourself
# Mar 12th 2009, 10:02 jperras exactly
# Mar 12th 2009, 09:59 _nate_ this is a Bad Thing
# Mar 12th 2009, 09:59 _nate_ the thoroughness of your validation actually changes from platform to platform
# Mar 12th 2009, 09:59 ADmad grr...
# Mar 12th 2009, 09:59 _nate_ ADmad: because then you get inconsistent validation results
# Mar 12th 2009, 09:58 ADmad dont see why majority have to suffer for a small minority who use windoze
# Mar 12th 2009, 09:57 ADmad jperras: regarding the e-mail validation ticket you closed, why cant be simple use "function_exists" and use getmxrr if available ?
# Mar 12th 2009, 09:54 alkemann laters
# Mar 12th 2009, 09:54 alkemann well i gotta go do something as antigeek as going to the gym to work out.. /sigh
# Mar 12th 2009, 09:53 ADmad yeah
# Mar 12th 2009, 09:52 alkemann wobbly bits?
# Mar 12th 2009, 09:49 alkemann poof
# Mar 12th 2009, 09:48 ADmad its give no more info than what api already does