Log message #548613

# At Username Text
# Feb 24th 2009, 15:15 jperras alkemann: hey
# Feb 24th 2009, 12:59 d1rk it could produce more switchers...
# Feb 24th 2009, 12:58 _nate_ k, brb
# Feb 24th 2009, 12:58 _nate_ heh
# Feb 24th 2009, 12:58 d1rk _nate_: well, maybe they plan to invade the windows world with more apps...
# Feb 24th 2009, 12:54 _nate_ d1rk: I mean, it's not like they have any incentive to encourage Windows development ;-)
# Feb 24th 2009, 12:53 _nate_ well, that'd require Apple's full company support, which, for Window's development, they probably wouldn't do
# Feb 24th 2009, 12:49 d1rk _nate_: yeah, would great if they open that to other developers.
# Feb 24th 2009, 12:38 _nate_ I'm sure Apple had to write a lot of custom libraries and UI rendering code to get Windows to do this
# Feb 24th 2009, 12:32 d1rk i coded c# for some years, but i would have no idea on how to do this.
# Feb 24th 2009, 12:32 _nate_ oh, yes, I suppose so
# Feb 24th 2009, 12:32 d1rk _nate_: having the look and feel of apple on win-machines.
# Feb 24th 2009, 12:31 _nate_ d1rk: sorry, do what exactly?
# Feb 24th 2009, 12:30 d1rk _nate_: yeah, but when apple can do it, others can too?
# Feb 24th 2009, 12:30 d1rk just bought a new 17" mac, but it takes weeks to get it. And i have to stick to win on some workplaces.. so, what should i say, more of that
# Feb 24th 2009, 12:30 _nate_ I think it's just Safari and iTunes
# Feb 24th 2009, 12:29 d1rk _nate_: yeah. I am addicted to Safari and the everything that goes with it... like, font-rendering and flying menus...
# Feb 24th 2009, 12:29 _nate_ other Apple software for Windows?
# Feb 24th 2009, 12:29 _nate_ d1rk: I wasn't sure what you were asking about in your tweet
# Feb 24th 2009, 12:28 d1rk _nate_: yeah! :)
# Feb 24th 2009, 10:45 _nate_ d1rk: hey man
# Feb 24th 2009, 08:06 alkemann moderators should also manage tags.. this is just silly : http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/tag-cloud
# Feb 24th 2009, 06:50 mariano_iglesias done
# Feb 24th 2009, 06:49 alkemann agreed :) add something about "checking a users total rating" to the "accept a user as author" use case _Ã¥
# Feb 24th 2009, 06:47 mariano_iglesias yeah thats what i said, we dont need karma, ratings are good enough
# Feb 24th 2009, 06:47 mariano_iglesias well actually karma can be auto-calculated thru number of possitive ratings
# Feb 24th 2009, 06:47 mariano_iglesias or at least that for some reason the community likes him :)
# Feb 24th 2009, 06:46 mariano_iglesias the bigger the karma, the easier for us moderators to know we should make this author an Authroized Author
# Feb 24th 2009, 06:46 mariano_iglesias karma +10
# Feb 24th 2009, 06:46 mariano_iglesias then i write article B, again lots of ratings publish it
# Feb 24th 2009, 06:46 mariano_iglesias my karma goes +10
# Feb 24th 2009, 06:46 mariano_iglesias im registered user, i write article A, i get lots of ratings and it gets published
# Feb 24th 2009, 06:46 mariano_iglesias on karma:
# Feb 24th 2009, 06:46 mariano_iglesias yeah
# Feb 24th 2009, 06:45 alkemann yea it should be possible. but deprecation tag and making an article wiki owned (so he can edit it) should cover most cases. unpublishing should jsut cover the most extreme cases
# Feb 24th 2009, 06:45 mariano_iglesias meaning that im a registered user
# Feb 24th 2009, 06:45 mariano_iglesias i mean since we have ratings for publishing, we might as well just get karma with it
# Feb 24th 2009, 06:45 mariano_iglesias did we add the concept of "karma" ?
# Feb 24th 2009, 06:44 mariano_iglesias so i dont see why not
# Feb 24th 2009, 06:44 mariano_iglesias yet even after it gets approved by rating, a moderator can unpublish it
# Feb 24th 2009, 06:44 mariano_iglesias i think its a nice idea, if enough ratings are given to an article