| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 12:29 |
_nate_ |
d1rk: I wasn't sure what you were asking about in your tweet |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 12:28 |
d1rk |
_nate_: yeah! :) |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 10:45 |
_nate_ |
d1rk: hey man |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 08:06 |
alkemann |
moderators should also manage tags.. this is just silly : http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/tag-cloud |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:50 |
mariano_iglesias |
done |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:49 |
alkemann |
agreed :) add something about "checking a users total rating" to the "accept a user as author" use case _Ã¥ |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:47 |
mariano_iglesias |
yeah thats what i said, we dont need karma, ratings are good enough |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:47 |
mariano_iglesias |
well actually karma can be auto-calculated thru number of possitive ratings |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:47 |
mariano_iglesias |
or at least that for some reason the community likes him :) |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:46 |
mariano_iglesias |
the bigger the karma, the easier for us moderators to know we should make this author an Authroized Author |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:46 |
mariano_iglesias |
karma +10 |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:46 |
mariano_iglesias |
then i write article B, again lots of ratings publish it |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:46 |
mariano_iglesias |
my karma goes +10 |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:46 |
mariano_iglesias |
im registered user, i write article A, i get lots of ratings and it gets published |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:46 |
mariano_iglesias |
on karma: |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:46 |
mariano_iglesias |
yeah |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:45 |
alkemann |
yea it should be possible. but deprecation tag and making an article wiki owned (so he can edit it) should cover most cases. unpublishing should jsut cover the most extreme cases |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:45 |
mariano_iglesias |
meaning that im a registered user |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:45 |
mariano_iglesias |
i mean since we have ratings for publishing, we might as well just get karma with it |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:45 |
mariano_iglesias |
did we add the concept of "karma" ? |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:44 |
mariano_iglesias |
so i dont see why not |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:44 |
mariano_iglesias |
yet even after it gets approved by rating, a moderator can unpublish it |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:44 |
mariano_iglesias |
i think its a nice idea, if enough ratings are given to an article |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:44 |
mariano_iglesias |
yeah i saw that |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:44 |
alkemann |
we have an ongoing discussion about publishing articles through a rating system you should be aware of though |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:44 |
mariano_iglesias |
yeah, i know we needed that a lot on current bakery |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:43 |
alkemann |
yea that sounds useful |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:42 |
mariano_iglesias |
before publishing it |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:42 |
mariano_iglesias |
so next time someone goes to this article, they see that |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:42 |
mariano_iglesias |
which is readable only by moderators |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:42 |
mariano_iglesias |
i think thats no good, so i unpublish it, and i add a publication note that saysd: "This article is bullshit" |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:41 |
mariano_iglesias |
and you published article XXX |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:41 |
mariano_iglesias |
right? |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:41 |
mariano_iglesias |
this is basically meaning we are both moderators |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:41 |
mariano_iglesias |
write "publishing" notes to an article (only readable by Moderators) |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:41 |
mariano_iglesias |
on moderators i added |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:41 |
mariano_iglesias |
read / delete / answer his own private messages |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:41 |
mariano_iglesias |
send a private message to an author of an article |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:41 |
mariano_iglesias |
ok i marked messages as private messages, so for ex and registered users you see: |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:40 |
alkemann |
so whats diff? |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:40 |
alkemann |
yea, i have put it on my wishlist to gwoo too |