| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:45 |
mariano_iglesias |
i mean since we have ratings for publishing, we might as well just get karma with it |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:45 |
mariano_iglesias |
did we add the concept of "karma" ? |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:44 |
mariano_iglesias |
so i dont see why not |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:44 |
mariano_iglesias |
yet even after it gets approved by rating, a moderator can unpublish it |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:44 |
mariano_iglesias |
i think its a nice idea, if enough ratings are given to an article |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:44 |
mariano_iglesias |
yeah i saw that |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:44 |
alkemann |
we have an ongoing discussion about publishing articles through a rating system you should be aware of though |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:44 |
mariano_iglesias |
yeah, i know we needed that a lot on current bakery |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:43 |
alkemann |
yea that sounds useful |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:42 |
mariano_iglesias |
before publishing it |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:42 |
mariano_iglesias |
so next time someone goes to this article, they see that |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:42 |
mariano_iglesias |
which is readable only by moderators |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:42 |
mariano_iglesias |
i think thats no good, so i unpublish it, and i add a publication note that saysd: "This article is bullshit" |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:41 |
mariano_iglesias |
and you published article XXX |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:41 |
mariano_iglesias |
right? |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:41 |
mariano_iglesias |
this is basically meaning we are both moderators |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:41 |
mariano_iglesias |
write "publishing" notes to an article (only readable by Moderators) |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:41 |
mariano_iglesias |
on moderators i added |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:41 |
mariano_iglesias |
read / delete / answer his own private messages |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:41 |
mariano_iglesias |
send a private message to an author of an article |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:41 |
mariano_iglesias |
ok i marked messages as private messages, so for ex and registered users you see: |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:40 |
alkemann |
so whats diff? |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:40 |
alkemann |
yea, i have put it on my wishlist to gwoo too |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:39 |
mariano_iglesias |
too bad we dont have a DIFF view so you can easily see the changes |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:39 |
mariano_iglesias |
alkemann: http://thechaw.com/bakery/wiki/use_cases/cases |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:37 |
mariano_iglesias |
im actually adding and changing smth now |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:35 |
mariano_iglesias |
yeah ok, i can work on this this afternoon |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:34 |
alkemann |
http://thechaw.com/bakery/wiki/use_cases/cases |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:33 |
mariano_iglesias |
do we have anything written so far? |
| # |
Feb 24th 2009, 06:30 |
alkemann |
mariano_iglesias: hey. any info on when you will be able to write the use cases? |
| # |
Feb 23rd 2009, 14:30 |
d1rk |
jperras: ah, ok. |
| # |
Feb 23rd 2009, 14:28 |
jperras |
d1rk: the links in the top right (news code articles) will offer a visual indicator of what section you are currently viewing |
| # |
Feb 23rd 2009, 14:28 |
d1rk |
jperras: what would you add, so the user knows in what section she is? |
| # |
Feb 23rd 2009, 14:27 |
jperras |
d1rk: in this mockup, yes |
| # |
Feb 23rd 2009, 14:26 |
d1rk |
so, the difference between startpage and a page of the section would be what items are displayed. Like a filter. |
| # |
Feb 23rd 2009, 14:25 |
d1rk |
jperras: yeah, alright |
| # |
Feb 23rd 2009, 14:25 |
d1rk |
gwoo: ok |
| # |
Feb 23rd 2009, 14:25 |
gwoo |
d1rk: featured articles are part of moderation |
| # |
Feb 23rd 2009, 14:25 |
jperras |
d1rk: we're only speaking about the layout and wireframe at the moment |
| # |
Feb 23rd 2009, 14:24 |
d1rk |
jperras: ah, ok. i see, so you let the community decide? Or is that part of the moderation? |
| # |
Feb 23rd 2009, 14:23 |
jperras |
at least in this mockup vision |