| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:04 |
gwoo |
no over abstractions |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:03 |
gwoo |
also, as a general rule of thumb bakery needs to be extremely simple |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:03 |
alkemann |
AD7six: i understood that to be your intent. i simply meant that requireing joining a habtm model to filter out deprecated articles may get expensive |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:03 |
AD7six |
jperras: np, I don't think we've left normality yet |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:03 |
jperras |
AD7six: don't go too crazy with schema stuff. I'd like to wait until a few more mockups are created |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:02 |
AD7six |
alkemann1: I'm suggesting that a tinyint deprecated field could (maybe, it's a point of discussion) would be better implemented as defining this-tag-causes-that-to-happen for articles |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:02 |
gwoo |
what is the template? |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:02 |
ADmad |
ACTION giggles |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:01 |
AD7six |
is there an echo? |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:01 |
alkemann1 |
who is? |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:01 |
AD7six |
that's not talking about model behaviors |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:01 |
AD7six |
alkemann yes? |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:01 |
alkemann1 |
AD7sixalkemann: how about rather than specifically deprecated, optionally (by admin) attaching 'behavior' to tags |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:00 |
AD7six |
I didn't mention a model behavior |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:59 |
alkemann1 |
deprecated (or mentioned tag) behavior |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:59 |
AD7six |
what logic |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:58 |
alkemann1 |
dont u think it would be much mroe effective to hav the logic in the model isntead of a habtm joined model? |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:58 |
ADmad |
like that idea |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:58 |
ADmad |
yup yup |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:58 |
AD7six |
ADmad: actually the template thing could behandled simply as a 'special' article for each category |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:57 |
alkemann1 |
AD7six: behavior to tags.. him.. |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:57 |
AD7six |
http://img511.imageshack.us/img511/173/schematicmneatoml0.png |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:56 |
AD7six |
yeah it does suck |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:56 |
AD7six |
I don't know if that's very useful (?) just thinking of a more general use for the code |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:55 |
AD7six |
alkemann: how about rather than specifically deprecated, optionally (by admin) attaching 'behavior' to tags |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:54 |
alkemann |
so something i thought about earlier that at least poLK liked. including the deprecated article feature from debuggable |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:53 |
alkemann |
kinda major weakness :( |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:52 |
AD7six |
yeah sucks doesn't it (I thought it, the app, looked cool till I couldn't read it) |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:52 |
ADmad |
AD7six: could you please post the next iteration of the schema somewhere where the full size can be viewed without dloading.. |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:51 |
alkemann |
damn wireless |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:50 |
ADmad |
alkemann: glad you decided to stop bouncing and join in for good :) |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:49 |
alkemann |
flag even |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:49 |
alkemann |
a flad should be enough. |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:49 |
AD7six |
I assume so, I'm just provoking a dialogue :) |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:49 |
alkemann |
community owned articles are either when an author abandons it by giving it up to the community or when moderators cant get hold of the author and it needs to be updated. |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:48 |
ADmad |
shouldnt a flag be enough ? |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:48 |
AD7six |
should that be handled by the permission system, or via a flag on article do you think? |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:47 |
ADmad |
*can update |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:47 |
ADmad |
regarding community i think it means any user and update the article.. (wasnt present when community owned was discussed) |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:46 |
ADmad |
guess so |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 12:46 |
AD7six |
yeah that's what I mean - so add the structure for that? |
