| # |
Jun 26th 2021, 15:37 |
mokiwaa |
I have a problem with the proffer plugin |
| # |
Jun 26th 2021, 15:36 |
 kevin.pfeifer |
just ask :) |
| # |
Jun 26th 2021, 15:35 |
mokiwaa |
:) |
| # |
Jun 26th 2021, 15:35 |
mokiwaa |
still |
| # |
Jun 26th 2021, 15:35 |
mokiwaa |
stile there? |
| # |
Jun 26th 2021, 15:16 |
kevin.pfeifer |
yes |
| # |
Jun 26th 2021, 15:10 |
mokiwaa |
someone online? |
| # |
Jun 26th 2021, 15:09 |
mokiwaa |
Hi |
| # |
Jun 26th 2021, 14:33 |
kevin.pfeifer |
from a quick read through I would also say that this data should be present in the junction table between the 2 main tables. And only the junction table has the foreign keys for the 2 main tables - therefore as Zuluru already said a `belongsToMany` |
| # |
Jun 26th 2021, 14:19 |
greg138 |
It sounds like this should be a `belongsToMany` association for both models, meaning that Answers is the join table. Am I missing something? |
| # |
Jun 26th 2021, 13:48 |
slackebot |
Recommendation to the Answer and landed on this current solution. What do you guys and gals think? |
| # |
Jun 26th 2021, 13:48 |
slackebot |
which has foreign keys for Assessment and Recommendation plus the extra data. When I create an Assessment record I use beforeMarshal to create an Answer for each Recommendation that was selected for the Assessment. While this works, it seems a little 'hacky'. Can anyone see a better way to achieve this outcome? I had originally tried with addition join table data but I couldn't figure out a way to join both the Assessment and |
| # |
Jun 26th 2021, 13:48 |
tomrwaller |
Hey everyone, just wanted to ask for some advice about how I'm currently doing my associations and whether anyone thinks there is a better way. I currently have Assessments and Recommendations. An Assessment has many Recommendations and a Recommendation can belong to many Assessments. I want to store answers to Recommendations for each Assessment. Just a couple of fields maybe up to 10. At the moment I have a Answers model |
| # |
Jun 25th 2021, 17:03 |
ricmelero |
Thank @admad and @kevin.pfeifer! |
| # |
Jun 25th 2021, 17:01 |
ricmelero |
never mind, I got it working now, later this year I expect to have fewer work and I may take a look into routing, I have noticed a few cases that are weird or may be improved (like redirecting to array styles named routes) and I'll loved to help... |
| # |
Jun 25th 2021, 16:56 |
steinkel |
we usually rely on any of the https://github.com/CakeDC/cakephp-api/tree/master/src/Service/Auth/Authenticate for API based applications |
| # |
Jun 25th 2021, 16:56 |
nick.vanderwoude |
@steinkel I did see that. Is it working? |
| # |
Jun 25th 2021, 16:55 |
steinkel |
@nick.vanderwoude we did some work time ago to provide a specific endpoint for ajax login here https://github.com/CakeDC/users/pull/789 |
| # |
Jun 25th 2021, 16:55 |
ricmelero |
although placeholder length is arbitrary... mm |
| # |
Jun 25th 2021, 16:54 |
ricmelero |
and there is no attemp to trying to check longer first.. even that I understand that it may have placeholders or dinamyc parts |
| # |
Jun 25th 2021, 16:53 |
ricmelero |
yep, I see that krsort, is present in a few places.. and yes @admad, I get that, and that's why I was thinking about it, inside each path, you may have many routes |
| # |
Jun 25th 2021, 16:52 |
admad |
But you lose that optimization for lang routes since they start with a placeholder |
| # |
Jun 25th 2021, 16:51 |
kevin.pfeifer |
i guess you mean that krsort https://github.com/cakephp/cakephp/blob/master/src/Routing/RouteCollection.php#L130 |
| # |
Jun 25th 2021, 16:51 |
admad |
It does sort them by *static* longer parts first. |
| # |
Jun 25th 2021, 16:50 |
ricmelero |
but besides that case, I was thinking that routes is trying to check longer paths first, ordering that way, but inside each path, this behavior does not apply... wouldn't be that a desired behavior? I mean, inside each path, sort routes with longer names or templates first.. I may work in a PR if that's the case |
| # |
Jun 25th 2021, 16:47 |
ricmelero |
this way is cleaner |
| # |
Jun 25th 2021, 16:47 |
ricmelero |
I had moved all inside Plugin::routes() method to my routes.php, also worked, but it wasn't feel rigth |
| # |
Jun 25th 2021, 16:45 |
ricmelero |
yeah, that did the trick, |
| # |
Jun 25th 2021, 16:44 |
admad |
you can use `$routes->loadPlugin('Foo')` at the top of your `routes.php` to load the plugin's route first. |
| # |
Jun 25th 2021, 16:43 |
ricmelero |
I can get it working, but it feel like a hack |
| # |
Jun 25th 2021, 16:43 |
ricmelero |
so, they are loaded after app routes |
| # |
Jun 25th 2021, 16:42 |
ricmelero |
I've app routes defined in config/routes.php, but plugin routes are in each plugin's Plugin::routes() method |
| # |
Jun 25th 2021, 16:41 |
admad |
Just overly generic routes are bound to cause you problems. |
| # |
Jun 25th 2021, 16:40 |
admad |
> sorry, it's like this "/{lang}/{controller}/{action}/*" Well then no wonder it matches, fix your routes order. |
| # |
Jun 25th 2021, 16:39 |
ricmelero |
may I attach an image here? |
| # |
Jun 25th 2021, 16:39 |
kevin.pfeifer |
but your `/{lang}/admin/{controller}/{action}` route is present above the blue one? |
| # |
Jun 25th 2021, 16:38 |
ricmelero |
@kevin.pfeifer yep |
| # |
Jun 25th 2021, 16:38 |
kevin.pfeifer |
so if you enable debugkit and check the “Routes” tab the wrong route is marked blue? |
| # |
Jun 25th 2021, 16:37 |
ricmelero |
that's why it matchs |
| # |
Jun 25th 2021, 16:37 |
ricmelero |
sorry, it's like this "/{lang}/{controller}/{action}/*" |
| # |
Jun 25th 2021, 16:34 |
admad |
> /es/admin/users/view/1 is matching with /{lang}/{controller}/{action} @ricmelero I don't see how that's possible since your URL has 4 parts while the route has just 3 (and there's no `/*` at the end). And even if that's the case just connect your routes for admin prefix earlier. |