Log message #899037

# At Username Text
# Jul 19th 2009, 16:16 alkemann good nite
# Jul 19th 2009, 16:09 alkemann i assume it's an alternate version of this : git@thechaw.com:bakery.git
# Jul 19th 2009, 16:08 Phally how would we get that URL?
# Jul 19th 2009, 16:07 alkemann https://www.ohloh.net/p/cakephp-bakery
# Jul 19th 2009, 16:07 alkemann tryingto create an ohloh project for us
# Jul 19th 2009, 16:06 alkemann what is the URL for the git file for bakery?
# Jul 19th 2009, 16:03 Phally heh
# Jul 19th 2009, 16:02 alkemann i called my google code project that.. yeah about that ego
# Jul 19th 2009, 16:02 pointlessjon_ haha
# Jul 19th 2009, 16:02 Phally rofl "Who uses alkemann?"
# Jul 19th 2009, 16:01 pointlessjon_ and be prompted of updates/revisions to said code
# Jul 19th 2009, 16:01 pointlessjon_ maybe users could have 'stacks' of all the code they use??
# Jul 19th 2009, 16:00 alkemann i use this button with numbers and list of profiles
# Jul 19th 2009, 16:00 alkemann *cough* i must have gotten this from ohloh.net https://www.ohloh.net/p/alkemann
# Jul 19th 2009, 16:00 Phally great! those statistics are a good boost for your ego alkemann :p make sure to put this in the wiki
# Jul 19th 2009, 15:59 pointlessjon_ nice!
# Jul 19th 2009, 15:58 alkemann ah even simpler an "I use this " button, that is linked to ur profile
# Jul 19th 2009, 15:58 pointlessjon_ you know if 2,000 sites are using code it probably does the job
# Jul 19th 2009, 15:58 alkemann that is probably a best way to not make bakery a link farm
# Jul 19th 2009, 15:58 pointlessjon_ kind of like a "downloads" statistic on a game demo site or the like, y'know
# Jul 19th 2009, 15:58 pointlessjon_ maybe author's can see the actual sites but users only see a number?
# Jul 19th 2009, 15:57 alkemann i know that as an article author i sure would find it interesting to know what apps out there are using my stuff
# Jul 19th 2009, 15:57 pointlessjon_ hmm.. i think it could be
# Jul 19th 2009, 15:57 alkemann hmm. maybe a numer wouldnt be very informative..
# Jul 19th 2009, 15:57 pointlessjon_ yeah
# Jul 19th 2009, 15:57 pointlessjon_ but kind of legitimizes the code
# Jul 19th 2009, 15:57 alkemann we could for instance let people submit an app name / email / url, that only author / moderatos see, while the public sees a number
# Jul 19th 2009, 15:56 pointlessjon_ yeah, it does run the risk of stagnation over time
# Jul 19th 2009, 15:56 alkemann it presents some practical concerns as you note, but we should seriously consider it
# Jul 19th 2009, 15:55 alkemann pointlessjon_: oooh i like ur suggestion about "sites usesing this code"
# Jul 19th 2009, 15:51 pointlessjon_ So that's going to be a fat list of subcategories
# Jul 19th 2009, 15:51 pointlessjon_ well, someday, huh? ;)
# Jul 19th 2009, 15:50 alkemann dont know if it is implemented in 1.3 yet, but it isnt in any stable
# Jul 19th 2009, 15:50 pointlessjon_ I thought gwoo or nate said datasources can now be in plugins? or maybe that's 1.3
# Jul 19th 2009, 15:50 pointlessjon_ perhaps the bakery should encourage it
# Jul 19th 2009, 15:49 alkemann rewriting an app into a plugin does take some effort atm. plus there are several things u cant have in a plugin, datasource and routes?
# Jul 19th 2009, 15:49 alkemann i dont think that is particulary true in practis
# Jul 19th 2009, 15:49 AD7six if you want to include it in more than one app - yes
# Jul 19th 2009, 15:48 pointlessjon_ i thought the idea behind a plugin was when you wanted to make your app most portable
# Jul 19th 2009, 15:48 alkemann and untill the namespace thing gets into core, plugins and apps are different
# Jul 19th 2009, 15:48 Phally cake dough (translated by google)