# |
Jul 19th 2009, 16:07 |
alkemann |
tryingto create an ohloh project for us |
# |
Jul 19th 2009, 16:06 |
alkemann |
what is the URL for the git file for bakery? |
# |
Jul 19th 2009, 16:03 |
Phally |
heh |
# |
Jul 19th 2009, 16:02 |
alkemann |
i called my google code project that.. yeah about that ego |
# |
Jul 19th 2009, 16:02 |
pointlessjon_ |
haha |
# |
Jul 19th 2009, 16:02 |
Phally |
rofl "Who uses alkemann?" |
# |
Jul 19th 2009, 16:01 |
pointlessjon_ |
and be prompted of updates/revisions to said code |
# |
Jul 19th 2009, 16:01 |
pointlessjon_ |
maybe users could have 'stacks' of all the code they use?? |
# |
Jul 19th 2009, 16:00 |
alkemann |
i use this button with numbers and list of profiles |
# |
Jul 19th 2009, 16:00 |
alkemann |
*cough* i must have gotten this from ohloh.net https://www.ohloh.net/p/alkemann |
# |
Jul 19th 2009, 16:00 |
Phally |
great! those statistics are a good boost for your ego alkemann :p make sure to put this in the wiki |
# |
Jul 19th 2009, 15:59 |
pointlessjon_ |
nice! |
# |
Jul 19th 2009, 15:58 |
alkemann |
ah even simpler an "I use this " button, that is linked to ur profile |
# |
Jul 19th 2009, 15:58 |
pointlessjon_ |
you know if 2,000 sites are using code it probably does the job |
# |
Jul 19th 2009, 15:58 |
alkemann |
that is probably a best way to not make bakery a link farm |
# |
Jul 19th 2009, 15:58 |
pointlessjon_ |
kind of like a "downloads" statistic on a game demo site or the like, y'know |
# |
Jul 19th 2009, 15:58 |
pointlessjon_ |
maybe author's can see the actual sites but users only see a number? |
# |
Jul 19th 2009, 15:57 |
alkemann |
i know that as an article author i sure would find it interesting to know what apps out there are using my stuff |
# |
Jul 19th 2009, 15:57 |
pointlessjon_ |
hmm.. i think it could be |
# |
Jul 19th 2009, 15:57 |
alkemann |
hmm. maybe a numer wouldnt be very informative.. |
# |
Jul 19th 2009, 15:57 |
pointlessjon_ |
yeah |
# |
Jul 19th 2009, 15:57 |
pointlessjon_ |
but kind of legitimizes the code |
# |
Jul 19th 2009, 15:57 |
alkemann |
we could for instance let people submit an app name / email / url, that only author / moderatos see, while the public sees a number |
# |
Jul 19th 2009, 15:56 |
pointlessjon_ |
yeah, it does run the risk of stagnation over time |
# |
Jul 19th 2009, 15:56 |
alkemann |
it presents some practical concerns as you note, but we should seriously consider it |
# |
Jul 19th 2009, 15:55 |
alkemann |
pointlessjon_: oooh i like ur suggestion about "sites usesing this code" |
# |
Jul 19th 2009, 15:51 |
pointlessjon_ |
So that's going to be a fat list of subcategories |
# |
Jul 19th 2009, 15:51 |
pointlessjon_ |
well, someday, huh? ;) |
# |
Jul 19th 2009, 15:50 |
alkemann |
dont know if it is implemented in 1.3 yet, but it isnt in any stable |
# |
Jul 19th 2009, 15:50 |
pointlessjon_ |
I thought gwoo or nate said datasources can now be in plugins? or maybe that's 1.3 |
# |
Jul 19th 2009, 15:50 |
pointlessjon_ |
perhaps the bakery should encourage it |
# |
Jul 19th 2009, 15:49 |
alkemann |
rewriting an app into a plugin does take some effort atm. plus there are several things u cant have in a plugin, datasource and routes? |
# |
Jul 19th 2009, 15:49 |
alkemann |
i dont think that is particulary true in practis |
# |
Jul 19th 2009, 15:49 |
AD7six |
if you want to include it in more than one app - yes |
# |
Jul 19th 2009, 15:48 |
pointlessjon_ |
i thought the idea behind a plugin was when you wanted to make your app most portable |
# |
Jul 19th 2009, 15:48 |
alkemann |
and untill the namespace thing gets into core, plugins and apps are different |
# |
Jul 19th 2009, 15:48 |
Phally |
cake dough (translated by google) |
# |
Jul 19th 2009, 15:48 |
alkemann |
bakery is an app, not a plugin. |
# |
Jul 19th 2009, 15:47 |
pointlessjon_ |
ooo, but wouldn't that best be a plugin? |
# |
Jul 19th 2009, 15:47 |
alkemann |
like bakery. is going to be open source |
# |
Jul 19th 2009, 15:47 |
alkemann |
maybe under Code we could have an App cat aas well . for people that wish to give their entire work away :p |