Log message #622342

# At Username Text
# Mar 26th 2009, 07:42 _nate_ if I'm not mistaken, that's also the philosophy around which jperras's rating system is devised
# Mar 26th 2009, 07:41 _nate_ if there was a designated place to toss up half-finished work for other people to hack on, then it could *become* finished
# Mar 26th 2009, 07:40 _nate_ then you're missing half the point of Open Source
# Mar 26th 2009, 07:39 alkemann bin. is where you put random stuff, while bakery. is where you present your finished hard work that could be useful to others. I don't see the gain in mixing the two
# Mar 26th 2009, 07:38 _nate_ not by default anyway
# Mar 26th 2009, 07:38 _nate_ nope
# Mar 26th 2009, 07:38 alkemann should you, when browsing through code, see lots of random pastes for each useful code bit?
# Mar 26th 2009, 07:38 _nate_ alkemann: I disagree, the bad doesn't need to be kept away, we just need a way to let the good sift to the top
# Mar 26th 2009, 07:37 alkemann _nate_: but good code would be mixed in with random irc help support bad code. there doesnt need to be a distinction between articles and good code, but the bad needs to be kept away :
# Mar 26th 2009, 07:36 _nate_ alkemann: that's exactly the problem we'd be solving -- I'm saying we could replace that one, and having it tied in closer to the Bakery would provide a clear distinction between "code" content and "article" content
# Mar 26th 2009, 07:34 alkemann bakery is already suffering from being treated as a paste bin, this could only make it worse. the one we have is good. and we (gwoo) wants to keep bakery 2.0 simple.
# Mar 26th 2009, 07:34 _nate_ plus, while still allowing anon submissions (well, with nicknames like we do now) we could tie it into user logins
# Mar 26th 2009, 07:33 jperras as well as easy linking to just the code
# Mar 26th 2009, 07:33 _nate_ yup
# Mar 26th 2009, 07:33 jperras and it would give long-term storage and easy copy/paste
# Mar 26th 2009, 07:32 _nate_ jperras: yeah
# Mar 26th 2009, 07:32 jperras code in articles sometimes make them a pita to read
# Mar 26th 2009, 07:32 alkemann why?
# Mar 26th 2009, 07:32 jperras _nate_: all for it
# Mar 26th 2009, 07:32 _nate_ or are there already enough to-do items on that milestone?
# Mar 26th 2009, 07:32 _nate_ jperras: what would you think about integrating the bin into Bakery 2.0?
# Mar 26th 2009, 07:31 _nate_ if it's who I'm thinking of
# Mar 26th 2009, 07:31 _nate_ he was in Argentina
# Mar 26th 2009, 07:31 _nate_ oh I think I know this guy
# Mar 26th 2009, 07:30 alkemann http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/magento-api-component
# Mar 26th 2009, 07:30 _nate_ link?
# Mar 26th 2009, 07:30 _nate_ heh
# Mar 26th 2009, 07:30 alkemann he even gave himself a 5 ;)
# Mar 26th 2009, 07:30 _nate_ I see
# Mar 26th 2009, 07:30 alkemann _nate_: article poster. its just a code paste of a component that should be a datasource
# Mar 26th 2009, 07:29 _nate_ alkemann: advise who?
# Mar 26th 2009, 07:29 alkemann maybe we can advise him to put it up at that snippet place _nate_ was talking about
# Mar 26th 2009, 07:29 jperras or at least in as neutral a tone as can be managed
# Mar 26th 2009, 07:28 jperras please
# Mar 26th 2009, 07:28 jperras let him know why, nicely
# Mar 26th 2009, 07:28 alkemann i feel plenty motivated to hit "delete" though ;)
# Mar 26th 2009, 07:27 alkemann i lack the budget insofar as there isnt one
# Mar 26th 2009, 07:26 jperras ;-)
# Mar 26th 2009, 07:26 jperras that might be the case, but you don't lack any of those to polish it up for the bakery.
# Mar 26th 2009, 07:26 alkemann not a good sign when the teaser of the article starts with : First, this really should be a datasource but my client lacks the budget, and myself the motivation, to refactor this.
# Mar 25th 2009, 07:39 ADmad np :)