| # |
Mar 26th 2009, 07:38 |
_nate_ |
alkemann: I disagree, the bad doesn't need to be kept away, we just need a way to let the good sift to the top |
| # |
Mar 26th 2009, 07:37 |
alkemann |
_nate_: but good code would be mixed in with random irc help support bad code. there doesnt need to be a distinction between articles and good code, but the bad needs to be kept away : |
| # |
Mar 26th 2009, 07:36 |
_nate_ |
alkemann: that's exactly the problem we'd be solving -- I'm saying we could replace that one, and having it tied in closer to the Bakery would provide a clear distinction between "code" content and "article" content |
| # |
Mar 26th 2009, 07:34 |
alkemann |
bakery is already suffering from being treated as a paste bin, this could only make it worse. the one we have is good. and we (gwoo) wants to keep bakery 2.0 simple. |
| # |
Mar 26th 2009, 07:34 |
_nate_ |
plus, while still allowing anon submissions (well, with nicknames like we do now) we could tie it into user logins |
| # |
Mar 26th 2009, 07:33 |
jperras |
as well as easy linking to just the code |
| # |
Mar 26th 2009, 07:33 |
_nate_ |
yup |
| # |
Mar 26th 2009, 07:33 |
jperras |
and it would give long-term storage and easy copy/paste |
| # |
Mar 26th 2009, 07:32 |
_nate_ |
jperras: yeah |
| # |
Mar 26th 2009, 07:32 |
jperras |
code in articles sometimes make them a pita to read |
| # |
Mar 26th 2009, 07:32 |
alkemann |
why? |
| # |
Mar 26th 2009, 07:32 |
jperras |
_nate_: all for it |
| # |
Mar 26th 2009, 07:32 |
_nate_ |
or are there already enough to-do items on that milestone? |
| # |
Mar 26th 2009, 07:32 |
_nate_ |
jperras: what would you think about integrating the bin into Bakery 2.0? |
| # |
Mar 26th 2009, 07:31 |
_nate_ |
if it's who I'm thinking of |
| # |
Mar 26th 2009, 07:31 |
_nate_ |
he was in Argentina |
| # |
Mar 26th 2009, 07:31 |
_nate_ |
oh I think I know this guy |
| # |
Mar 26th 2009, 07:30 |
alkemann |
http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/magento-api-component |
| # |
Mar 26th 2009, 07:30 |
_nate_ |
link? |
| # |
Mar 26th 2009, 07:30 |
_nate_ |
heh |
| # |
Mar 26th 2009, 07:30 |
alkemann |
he even gave himself a 5 ;) |
| # |
Mar 26th 2009, 07:30 |
_nate_ |
I see |
| # |
Mar 26th 2009, 07:30 |
alkemann |
_nate_: article poster. its just a code paste of a component that should be a datasource |
| # |
Mar 26th 2009, 07:29 |
_nate_ |
alkemann: advise who? |
| # |
Mar 26th 2009, 07:29 |
alkemann |
maybe we can advise him to put it up at that snippet place _nate_ was talking about |
| # |
Mar 26th 2009, 07:29 |
jperras |
or at least in as neutral a tone as can be managed |
| # |
Mar 26th 2009, 07:28 |
jperras |
please |
| # |
Mar 26th 2009, 07:28 |
jperras |
let him know why, nicely |
| # |
Mar 26th 2009, 07:28 |
alkemann |
i feel plenty motivated to hit "delete" though ;) |
| # |
Mar 26th 2009, 07:27 |
alkemann |
i lack the budget insofar as there isnt one |
| # |
Mar 26th 2009, 07:26 |
jperras |
;-) |
| # |
Mar 26th 2009, 07:26 |
jperras |
that might be the case, but you don't lack any of those to polish it up for the bakery. |
| # |
Mar 26th 2009, 07:26 |
alkemann |
not a good sign when the teaser of the article starts with : First, this really should be a datasource but my client lacks the budget, and myself the motivation, to refactor this. |
| # |
Mar 25th 2009, 07:39 |
ADmad |
np :) |
| # |
Mar 25th 2009, 07:39 |
_nate_ |
brb |
| # |
Mar 25th 2009, 07:39 |
_nate_ |
mornin' :-) |
| # |
Mar 25th 2009, 07:39 |
_nate_ |
ADmad: nope, not too early, I'm just back and forth |
| # |
Mar 25th 2009, 07:30 |
ADmad |
hmm... guess its still too early |
| # |
Mar 25th 2009, 07:27 |
ADmad |
morning _nate_ |
| # |
Mar 24th 2009, 16:35 |
jperras |
yes, that might be a problem |
| # |
Mar 24th 2009, 16:35 |
jperras |
haha |