| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:48 |
jperras |
hehe. I've seen Terminator. I know how things are going to go down. |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:46 |
alkemann |
turncoat eh? :) |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:43 |
jperras |
I, for one, welcome our robotic overlords. |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:43 |
jperras |
and apparently our robots will soon rise against us |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:42 |
alkemann |
on the plus side, it's not often you get the "150 000 years later" .. usually a bit smaller number ;) |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:39 |
jperras |
yeah, it was kind of a defeated conclusion |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:29 |
alkemann |
they did a lot of blind sacrificing for ideas and causes they didnt understand. and in the end a mutal piece was broken and the cylon race lost on the very human emotion of vengence (chief). all the blue and green colours of africa wasnt enough to make me believe it was a happy ending |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:27 |
alkemann |
i suspect i think ? wow thats vague heh |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:27 |
alkemann |
all stories are metaphors. what I mean is that I suspect is that I think I dissagree with the philosofies of the writers. |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:24 |
jperras |
and angels etc. |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:23 |
jperras |
but they might have pushed it a bit far with the god/gods thing in bsg |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:23 |
jperras |
sci-fi does that a lot. allegories and symbolism are in nearly all good sci-fi shows |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:21 |
alkemann |
me thinks it was symbolic. a lot of symbolism in it i find kinda scary :) |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:20 |
alkemann |
kinda seemed like even then they shruged |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:20 |
jperras |
seemed like the writters didn't know what they wanted her to be until the last episode |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:19 |
jperras |
hahaha |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:19 |
alkemann |
but a much more important question: Whats up with Hera? |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:17 |
alkemann |
seems like noone tbh |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:17 |
jperras |
have to talk to gwoo about that I guess. I'm actually not sure who maintains the current bakery codebase. |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:16 |
jperras |
ah ok |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:16 |
alkemann |
jperras: i meant for current version, we will of course fix it in 2.0 :) |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:16 |
alkemann |
i guess ur fears were valid |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:16 |
alkemann |
lol |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:15 |
jperras |
alkemann: try to submit a comment on an article that has been soft deleted |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:14 |
jperras |
whoa, that's weird |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:13 |
jperras |
not sure if I understand. you mean for 2.0? |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:11 |
alkemann |
it is (probably) some perfectionistic flaw in me, but it irks me to see the pending above 0 when we have done our job.. could we test the delete, or agree on edit to draft, or edit code to give us unpublish to draft option in the pending queue? |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:09 |
jperras |
to put it nicely |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:09 |
jperras |
yeah, that's a delete |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:07 |
alkemann |
top of deleted list |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:07 |
jperras |
at least, I don't think I did |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:07 |
jperras |
no |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:07 |
alkemann |
did u see the one i axed? |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:05 |
jperras |
the numbers don't even add up |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:05 |
jperras |
no clue |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:05 |
ADmad |
holy shit :P |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:04 |
alkemann |
do u know why http://bakery.cakephp.org/admin/articles says 221 pending articles? heh |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:03 |
jperras |
alkemann: I'll take a look at it today |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:03 |
alkemann |
did u look at phally's article? I dont feel qualified for it |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:03 |
jperras |
a 'pending review' and a 'reviewed, but needs work' |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:02 |
alkemann |
i also think we could edit to make drafts of articles we give feedback on, that will be published pending approvall |