| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:19 |
alkemann |
but a much more important question: Whats up with Hera? |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:17 |
alkemann |
seems like noone tbh |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:17 |
jperras |
have to talk to gwoo about that I guess. I'm actually not sure who maintains the current bakery codebase. |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:16 |
jperras |
ah ok |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:16 |
alkemann |
jperras: i meant for current version, we will of course fix it in 2.0 :) |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:16 |
alkemann |
i guess ur fears were valid |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:16 |
alkemann |
lol |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:15 |
jperras |
alkemann: try to submit a comment on an article that has been soft deleted |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:14 |
jperras |
whoa, that's weird |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:13 |
jperras |
not sure if I understand. you mean for 2.0? |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:11 |
alkemann |
it is (probably) some perfectionistic flaw in me, but it irks me to see the pending above 0 when we have done our job.. could we test the delete, or agree on edit to draft, or edit code to give us unpublish to draft option in the pending queue? |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:09 |
jperras |
to put it nicely |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:09 |
jperras |
yeah, that's a delete |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:07 |
alkemann |
top of deleted list |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:07 |
jperras |
at least, I don't think I did |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:07 |
jperras |
no |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:07 |
alkemann |
did u see the one i axed? |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:05 |
jperras |
the numbers don't even add up |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:05 |
jperras |
no clue |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:05 |
ADmad |
holy shit :P |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:04 |
alkemann |
do u know why http://bakery.cakephp.org/admin/articles says 221 pending articles? heh |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:03 |
jperras |
alkemann: I'll take a look at it today |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:03 |
alkemann |
did u look at phally's article? I dont feel qualified for it |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:03 |
jperras |
a 'pending review' and a 'reviewed, but needs work' |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:02 |
alkemann |
i also think we could edit to make drafts of articles we give feedback on, that will be published pending approvall |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:02 |
jperras |
really, it needs two queues |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:02 |
jperras |
yeah |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:02 |
alkemann |
with pending lists not even showing our author pm's there is no way to assess the status of an article without looking at it |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:02 |
jperras |
not sure if that would still allow him to message back |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:01 |
alkemann |
it is a soft delete |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:00 |
jperras |
I'll wait a day or so to see if there's a response. |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:00 |
alkemann |
u deleteing then? |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 09:59 |
alkemann |
./admin/comments .. hard to use it to find my comment |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 09:59 |
jperras |
indeed |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 09:59 |
alkemann |
sigh the admin tools are a bit lacking. good news is we got room for improvement in 2.0 |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 09:58 |
jperras |
it's a wrong submission on a few levels |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 09:58 |
jperras |
heeh |
| # |
Mar 22nd 2009, 09:57 |
alkemann |
jperras: lol i was writing a thanks but no thanks at the same time.. |
| # |
Mar 20th 2009, 09:51 |
_nate_ |
almost |
| # |
Mar 20th 2009, 09:51 |
_nate_ |
heh |
| # |
Mar 20th 2009, 09:51 |
jperras |
almost makes sheep hearding look interesting ;-) |