| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:53 |
AD7six |
"why is my article held back wanting xyz when there are so many already published without it" |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:53 |
AD7six |
alkemann: there are n (where n is a big number) of articles that authors refer to to know what to do |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:52 |
alkemann |
AD7six: i dont understand relevance of fairness |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:52 |
jperras |
context is important |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:52 |
jperras |
alkemann: I think that's a reasonable requirement, yes. |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:52 |
AD7six |
e.g. the xml tree helper - what's unclear about its objective |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:52 |
AD7six |
alkemann: I don't think with the current bakery it's necessary to be overly strict - it seems unfair to the authors |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:52 |
alkemann |
jperras: i meant : should provide clear explanations of the article's objective, and how that objective is achieved. |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:51 |
jperras |
alkemann: that requirement is a little difficult to fulfill, since there can easily be some overlap between two posts, yet their content/implementation may be different |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:50 |
alkemann |
last two part sorta supports my wish for some flesh around the code bits |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:48 |
alkemann |
what about "The topic should be of interest to a broad range of CakePHP developers. It should not have already been covered by another article and should provide clear explanations of the article's objective, and how that objective is achieved." |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:46 |
alkemann |
but that's neither here nor there |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:45 |
alkemann |
AD7six: currently the bakery states that all code must follow the https://trac.cakephp.org/wiki/Developement/CodingStandards - i bet you I could kill most the articles I dont "like" with this (existing) rule ;) |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:39 |
AD7six |
the recent foo articles is a different point for me |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:39 |
AD7six |
there are requirements alkemann but they aren't as strict as you're saying (is my point) |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:38 |
gwoo |
alkemann: we gave teknoid a chance, but it appears that he has just been publishing everything he sees |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:37 |
alkemann |
why even have moderation, if there arent any requirements for the stuff posted |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:37 |
AD7six |
you're right but it isn't [right now] |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:36 |
alkemann |
I think most or at least many would be willing to spend a little more time on it, if this was required / advocated |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:35 |
alkemann |
sorry for the self reference, but http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/flashhelper-a-wrapper-for-the-swfobject-js-class |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:33 |
AD7six |
I didn't (I generally don't look at the bakery) - foibles asside it's a useful example imo - there aren't that many examples of how to get xml around, and almostall helper articles are just that: the helper code only. |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:28 |
alkemann |
if it's ok that people only post their code, could we at least have stricted demands for the code? ie php doc and cleaned of debugs etc |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:21 |
alkemann |
imho this belongs in bin.cakephp.org and not bakery.cakephp.org .. |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:20 |
jperras |
'twas not I who published it |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:20 |
alkemann |
an example and/or description of what it does could be nice.. the example give doesnt actually tell me anything |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:18 |
mariano_iglesias |
i didnt |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:17 |
gwoo |
we really need to know "published_by" |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:17 |
gwoo |
i wonder if mariano_iglesias published that one |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:17 |
gwoo |
the debug should have been removed |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:16 |
gwoo |
and there is an example |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:16 |
gwoo |
so an article is not required |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:16 |
gwoo |
alkemann: its in the "helper" sections |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:15 |
alkemann |
there is no article. no api. no documentation. and the code has debug() in it |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:15 |
gwoo |
alkemann: you don't like that one? |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:15 |
alkemann |
ppl need to be told that bakery is not a paste bin |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:14 |
alkemann |
http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/serializing-find-threaded-data-to-xml |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 09:14 |
alkemann |
wtf is happening with bakery.. every freaking article posted are garbage |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 05:33 |
ADmad |
Abba Brayant's comments are spot on |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 05:32 |
ADmad |
alkemann: its more about just the vendor class which isnt related / uses cake at all |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 05:31 |
ADmad |
alkemann: another article which i am not quite sure should have been published http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/bake-an-html-screen-scraper |
| # |
Mar 11th 2009, 03:36 |
alkemann |
an appropriate amount me thinks ;) |