| # |
Mar 6th 2009, 14:52 |
_nate_ |
TommyO was asking |
| # |
Mar 6th 2009, 14:52 |
_nate_ |
ADmad: k, thanks |
| # |
Mar 6th 2009, 14:51 |
ADmad |
_nate_: i think mariano and teknoid are... not sure |
| # |
Mar 6th 2009, 14:49 |
_nate_ |
hey, who's currently in charge of what gets published to the Bakery? |
| # |
Mar 6th 2009, 10:22 |
gwoo |
jperras: sup |
| # |
Mar 6th 2009, 07:06 |
ADmad |
wish it showed the publishing moderator |
| # |
Mar 6th 2009, 07:05 |
alkemann |
dunno |
| # |
Mar 6th 2009, 07:05 |
_nate_ |
who published it? |
| # |
Mar 6th 2009, 07:05 |
alkemann |
bit frustrated that this is published at bakery : http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/database-configuration-model |
| # |
Mar 6th 2009, 07:04 |
_nate_ |
what's up? |
| # |
Mar 6th 2009, 07:04 |
_nate_ |
alkemann: hey man |
| # |
Mar 6th 2009, 07:04 |
alkemann |
hey nate and mariano |
| # |
Mar 6th 2009, 07:00 |
ADmad |
alkemann: the moderators are to blame imho |
| # |
Mar 6th 2009, 07:00 |
alkemann |
we gotta get ppl to stop using bakery as a friggin paste bin |
| # |
Mar 6th 2009, 06:59 |
alkemann |
but yea thats what he is doing.. |
| # |
Mar 6th 2009, 06:57 |
alkemann |
tbh i didnt bother finereading the code |
| # |
Mar 6th 2009, 06:57 |
ADmad |
alkemann: is that genius reading db config from db and then writing it to database.php ? |
| # |
Mar 6th 2009, 06:55 |
ADmad |
alkemann: not yet |
| # |
Mar 6th 2009, 06:54 |
alkemann |
http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/database-configuration-model |
| # |
Mar 6th 2009, 06:54 |
alkemann |
ADmad: seen the latest disgrace on bakery? |
| # |
Mar 5th 2009, 12:58 |
NHoppe |
Alright. Sorry! :) |
| # |
Mar 5th 2009, 12:57 |
ADmad |
NHoppe: this channel is not for general cakephp related questions :) plz just be patient and ask again after some time in #cakephp |
| # |
Mar 5th 2009, 12:53 |
NHoppe |
Hello! Is there anybody knowing about CakePHP besides ADmad, who seems to be very busy right know? |
| # |
Mar 4th 2009, 11:48 |
alkemann |
he added some to the list, but afaik none is written |
| # |
Mar 4th 2009, 11:48 |
mariano_iglesias |
i think we are ready to start coding |
| # |
Mar 4th 2009, 11:48 |
gwoo |
maybe we can start coding the users stuff |
| # |
Mar 4th 2009, 11:47 |
gwoo |
but we need jperras |
| # |
Mar 4th 2009, 11:47 |
gwoo |
alkemann: i thought mariano_iglesias added a coupl |
| # |
Mar 4th 2009, 11:47 |
gwoo |
alkemann: yeah i know |
| # |
Mar 4th 2009, 11:46 |
alkemann |
gwoo: know anything about the use cases or mockups? no action in a while now |
| # |
Mar 1st 2009, 21:18 |
poLK |
welcome |
| # |
Mar 1st 2009, 21:17 |
poLK |
mib_pzoc3f: yes, it goes to approval queue when changed |
| # |
Mar 1st 2009, 21:10 |
mib_pzoc3f |
Does anyone know if there's an issue with getting an article re-published if you made a minor change? Does it go back into the normal publish queue. Sorry to post this question here, wasn't sure who to ask... |
| # |
Mar 1st 2009, 07:30 |
ADmad |
hi alkemann |
| # |
Mar 1st 2009, 07:30 |
alkemann |
morn mad |
| # |
Mar 1st 2009, 06:51 |
d1rk |
alkemann: i agree |
| # |
Mar 1st 2009, 06:37 |
alkemann |
if he cares so little about what he posts why should we publish it |
| # |
Mar 1st 2009, 06:37 |
alkemann |
take this guy : http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/imagebehavior-best-from-database-blobs-and-file-storage he didnt finish the php doc or remove debugs and outcommented code. he links to a non existant external source.. |
| # |
Mar 1st 2009, 06:36 |
alkemann |
well thats kinda my point. we have to reject articles with constructive critisism so they can improve them to a decent quality level (given that there is something of value at all, which is not always the case) |
| # |
Mar 1st 2009, 06:35 |
d1rk |
But that still depends on the authors character... |
| # |
Mar 1st 2009, 06:34 |
d1rk |
i guess, if they get productive feedback they can do better. |