Log message #568165

# At Username Text
# Mar 6th 2009, 07:06 ADmad wish it showed the publishing moderator
# Mar 6th 2009, 07:05 alkemann dunno
# Mar 6th 2009, 07:05 _nate_ who published it?
# Mar 6th 2009, 07:05 alkemann bit frustrated that this is published at bakery : http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/database-configuration-model
# Mar 6th 2009, 07:04 _nate_ what's up?
# Mar 6th 2009, 07:04 _nate_ alkemann: hey man
# Mar 6th 2009, 07:04 alkemann hey nate and mariano
# Mar 6th 2009, 07:00 ADmad alkemann: the moderators are to blame imho
# Mar 6th 2009, 07:00 alkemann we gotta get ppl to stop using bakery as a friggin paste bin
# Mar 6th 2009, 06:59 alkemann but yea thats what he is doing..
# Mar 6th 2009, 06:57 alkemann tbh i didnt bother finereading the code
# Mar 6th 2009, 06:57 ADmad alkemann: is that genius reading db config from db and then writing it to database.php ?
# Mar 6th 2009, 06:55 ADmad alkemann: not yet
# Mar 6th 2009, 06:54 alkemann http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/database-configuration-model
# Mar 6th 2009, 06:54 alkemann ADmad: seen the latest disgrace on bakery?
# Mar 5th 2009, 12:58 NHoppe Alright. Sorry! :)
# Mar 5th 2009, 12:57 ADmad NHoppe: this channel is not for general cakephp related questions :) plz just be patient and ask again after some time in #cakephp
# Mar 5th 2009, 12:53 NHoppe Hello! Is there anybody knowing about CakePHP besides ADmad, who seems to be very busy right know?
# Mar 4th 2009, 11:48 alkemann he added some to the list, but afaik none is written
# Mar 4th 2009, 11:48 mariano_iglesias i think we are ready to start coding
# Mar 4th 2009, 11:48 gwoo maybe we can start coding the users stuff
# Mar 4th 2009, 11:47 gwoo but we need jperras
# Mar 4th 2009, 11:47 gwoo alkemann: i thought mariano_iglesias added a coupl
# Mar 4th 2009, 11:47 gwoo alkemann: yeah i know
# Mar 4th 2009, 11:46 alkemann gwoo: know anything about the use cases or mockups? no action in a while now
# Mar 1st 2009, 21:18 poLK welcome
# Mar 1st 2009, 21:17 poLK mib_pzoc3f: yes, it goes to approval queue when changed
# Mar 1st 2009, 21:10 mib_pzoc3f Does anyone know if there's an issue with getting an article re-published if you made a minor change? Does it go back into the normal publish queue. Sorry to post this question here, wasn't sure who to ask...
# Mar 1st 2009, 07:30 ADmad hi alkemann
# Mar 1st 2009, 07:30 alkemann morn mad
# Mar 1st 2009, 06:51 d1rk alkemann: i agree
# Mar 1st 2009, 06:37 alkemann if he cares so little about what he posts why should we publish it
# Mar 1st 2009, 06:37 alkemann take this guy : http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/imagebehavior-best-from-database-blobs-and-file-storage he didnt finish the php doc or remove debugs and outcommented code. he links to a non existant external source..
# Mar 1st 2009, 06:36 alkemann well thats kinda my point. we have to reject articles with constructive critisism so they can improve them to a decent quality level (given that there is something of value at all, which is not always the case)
# Mar 1st 2009, 06:35 d1rk But that still depends on the authors character...
# Mar 1st 2009, 06:34 d1rk i guess, if they get productive feedback they can do better.
# Mar 1st 2009, 06:34 d1rk Bakery is a good place for them to get in touch with authoring articles.
# Mar 1st 2009, 06:34 d1rk alkemann: i really believe, they need help with it. Most of them never ever published anything like this.
# Mar 1st 2009, 06:02 alkemann Dont get me wrong. I do believe that many of the authors we do have could have written better articles. Maybe our plans for enforced article page structure will alliviate some of it. but mostly i think that ppl should just use more time on them
# Mar 1st 2009, 06:00 alkemann and more crap hits the bakery.. I know im probably an ass with too high expectations, but truthfully I am not motivated to work on the new bakery when all the articles I see being published are this bad. It's like only the wrong sort of people are publishing their stuff here. The good people post on their own blogs.. Maybe we should just make an aggregator instead ?
# Feb 25th 2009, 03:17 alkemann yea that would be naise feature i think