| # |
Feb 23rd 2009, 13:40 |
jperras |
we'll see what the designer comes up with ;-) |
| # |
Feb 23rd 2009, 13:39 |
d1rk |
jperras: i see. Will there be more design work be done on the bakery? Or is the aim to have the same look as the current? |
| # |
Feb 23rd 2009, 13:38 |
jperras |
d1rk: the mockups/wireframes are being based off of the use cases that are listed in the bakery wiki pages |
| # |
Feb 23rd 2009, 13:38 |
d1rk |
jperras: hehe, ok. I am just curious. Especially, what type of elements will be in there. Do you have a list of items, you will put into the wireframes? |
| # |
Feb 23rd 2009, 13:37 |
jperras |
d1rk: I'd rather not give hard deadlines, but sooner rather than later. |
| # |
Feb 23rd 2009, 13:36 |
d1rk |
jperras: ok, when do you think will that be? |
| # |
Feb 23rd 2009, 13:36 |
jperras |
d1rk: not yet |
| # |
Feb 23rd 2009, 13:29 |
d1rk |
jperras: are the wireframes finished? |
| # |
Feb 23rd 2009, 05:34 |
d1rk |
hi all, are the wireframes ready, jperras ? |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:49 |
gwoo |
hehe |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:41 |
jperras |
might want to purge the logs then ;-) |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:40 |
gwoo |
shh don't tell |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:40 |
ADmad |
really doubt thats what he meant :) |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:39 |
jperras |
you want May 1st as a soft deadline? |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:39 |
gwoo |
reboot |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:39 |
gwoo |
may first rebot? |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:38 |
gwoo |
color/font/spacing/etc |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:38 |
jperras |
ah ok |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:38 |
gwoo |
i was speaking more to the color than the structure |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:38 |
ADmad |
*dose |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:38 |
ADmad |
i did my does of IE swearing earlier today :) |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:38 |
gwoo |
yeah |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:37 |
jperras |
ok, sounds like a plan. it won't be 0 boundaries though, since there are the mockups to consider |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:37 |
gwoo |
did you see the stats about IE8? |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:37 |
jperras |
hehe |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:37 |
gwoo |
cause all anyone does is swear at it |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:37 |
jperras |
IE is considered swearing in our office |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:37 |
gwoo |
what i would suggest is try a design with 0 boundaries and try one with the limitations imposed by staying true to the current design |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:37 |
AD7six |
don't show him it if he uses IE :) |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:36 |
jperras |
I'll show the designer the cakephp.org site, as well as the book |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:36 |
gwoo |
but i am also open to experimentation |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:36 |
gwoo |
just to keep something consistent |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:36 |
gwoo |
jperras: ^^ |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:35 |
gwoo |
i'd like to try to stick with what we have on cakephp.org |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:30 |
jperras |
if there's a specific color scheme that you want to keep, let me know |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:26 |
jperras |
cool |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:25 |
gwoo |
but we will certainly keep in mind the possibility of a unified look with distinctive markers |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:24 |
gwoo |
jperras: i would like your guys to have some latitude to be creative |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 10:13 |
alkemann |
yea, i agree |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 10:12 |
AD7six |
might not be a good idea - thought I'd ask. dictionary.com is a good example of unified and different |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 10:11 |
alkemann |
its good to have a unified look. but it should also be easy to see when ur reading an article and when ur reading in the book |