| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:38 |
ADmad |
i did my does of IE swearing earlier today :) |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:38 |
gwoo |
yeah |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:37 |
jperras |
ok, sounds like a plan. it won't be 0 boundaries though, since there are the mockups to consider |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:37 |
gwoo |
did you see the stats about IE8? |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:37 |
jperras |
hehe |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:37 |
gwoo |
cause all anyone does is swear at it |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:37 |
jperras |
IE is considered swearing in our office |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:37 |
gwoo |
what i would suggest is try a design with 0 boundaries and try one with the limitations imposed by staying true to the current design |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:37 |
AD7six |
don't show him it if he uses IE :) |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:36 |
jperras |
I'll show the designer the cakephp.org site, as well as the book |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:36 |
gwoo |
but i am also open to experimentation |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:36 |
gwoo |
just to keep something consistent |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:36 |
gwoo |
jperras: ^^ |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:35 |
gwoo |
i'd like to try to stick with what we have on cakephp.org |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:30 |
jperras |
if there's a specific color scheme that you want to keep, let me know |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:26 |
jperras |
cool |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:25 |
gwoo |
but we will certainly keep in mind the possibility of a unified look with distinctive markers |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 11:24 |
gwoo |
jperras: i would like your guys to have some latitude to be creative |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 10:13 |
alkemann |
yea, i agree |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 10:12 |
AD7six |
might not be a good idea - thought I'd ask. dictionary.com is a good example of unified and different |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 10:11 |
alkemann |
its good to have a unified look. but it should also be easy to see when ur reading an article and when ur reading in the book |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 10:06 |
jperras |
We can if we want to, but we have a good amount of freedom |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 10:00 |
alkemann |
jperras: goody :) |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 09:59 |
AD7six |
jperras: you think we can use the same/similar design for the book, or is that not such a hot idea |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 09:58 |
jperras |
I've got the green light to use our graphic designer for bakery |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 09:58 |
jperras |
good news about graphic design |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 08:13 |
alkemann |
schema and baked files there |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 08:12 |
alkemann |
yes |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 08:12 |
AD7six |
at the time I didn't know there was a 2.0 branch, so that's the active dev? |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 08:12 |
alkemann |
oh.. well the master wont have any code before after cycle one |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 08:11 |
AD7six |
I forked the repo, yo ucan't fork a branch |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 08:03 |
alkemann |
u forked the master, not 2.0.x.x though ? |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 08:02 |
AD7six |
I'll check a little later |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 08:02 |
AD7six |
probalby I do |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 08:02 |
alkemann |
if u dont have. make gwoo give u access to commit to http://thechaw.com/bakery/source/branches/2.0.x.x |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 08:02 |
AD7six |
I don't know, I created a fork for myself since it's probably easier to manage experiments than via branches. I don't know if I have commit access the the parent |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 07:59 |
alkemann |
do we need to work with forks though? |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 07:56 |
AD7six |
coolio - I'll upload it to my fork after some tweaking |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 07:56 |
alkemann |
we could include it as plugins in bakery and branch away later? |
| # |
Feb 20th 2009, 07:52 |
AD7six |
where should the repo (?) for the users plugin, common the book, bakery and anything else in the future, reside. |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 15:53 |
AD7six |
nite |