| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:34 |
jperras |
with an override for special announcements when they come up |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:33 |
jperras |
that could work |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:33 |
alkemann |
i agree on the boxes. but im unsure about timeline. im thinking using more space for hottest articles. maybe auto "feature" highest scoring stuff |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:31 |
jperras |
if you have ideas, I'm all ears ;-) |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:31 |
jperras |
really, I just want to get away from the mishmash of boxes |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:29 |
jperras |
alkemann: ok, tag cloud can stay at the same spot above the 'hottest stuff' |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:28 |
jperras |
iirc* |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:28 |
jperras |
most of those articles actually appear in the top boxes first, irrc |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:28 |
alkemann |
i think gwoo wants to keep tag cloud on home page as well |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:27 |
alkemann |
but im unsure about timeline. i do use the footer on the current bakery, but i think i have never read or used the contents of the "Recent articles.." |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:27 |
jperras |
so a timeline-type of view is a way of correcting those flaws |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:27 |
alkemann |
yes |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:27 |
jperras |
and some of them are stale for weeks |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:26 |
jperras |
there are just too many boxes, currently |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:26 |
jperras |
well, I think it's a good compromise for the many different types of articles we currently show on the front page |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:25 |
alkemann |
u want to give most space for a timeline? |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:25 |
alkemann |
ok looking at it |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:24 |
jperras |
alkemann: yes |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:24 |
alkemann |
have to dl to see full size? |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:23 |
jperras |
but it's a pretty good app for filesharing |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:23 |
jperras |
yeah, I have no idea which ICANN country that belongs to |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:22 |
alkemann |
.io ? |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:22 |
jperras |
http://drop.io/jperras |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:22 |
jperras |
partly, yes |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:22 |
alkemann |
up late heh.. working on wires? |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:22 |
jperras |
my sleep schedule is pretty messed up |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:21 |
jperras |
EST time here, so 3:40am |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:21 |
alkemann |
9:40 am here |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:21 |
jperras |
alkemann: heh, kinda |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:20 |
alkemann |
good morning |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:20 |
alkemann |
yes |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:19 |
jperras |
alkemann: you there? |
| # |
Feb 18th 2009, 15:31 |
alkemann |
g'nite |
| # |
Feb 18th 2009, 14:26 |
d1rk |
jperras: what do you think the wireframes will be ready? |
| # |
Feb 18th 2009, 14:26 |
d1rk |
gotta go, see you all later. |
| # |
Feb 18th 2009, 14:21 |
d1rk |
alkemann: yes, especially if talking about features, but we have to do something before that, so if development cycles get shorter one could setup ci. |
| # |
Feb 18th 2009, 14:20 |
d1rk |
jperras: yeah - hehe. lets see if i can stretch this very day to 36 hours... uhm, no.. failed.. so... |
| # |
Feb 18th 2009, 14:20 |
alkemann |
being able to checkout the dev branch to an online server could be useful for sure |
| # |
Feb 18th 2009, 14:18 |
jperras |
d1rk: you make some good points, for sure. but yeah, I think we can drop this for the moment |
| # |
Feb 18th 2009, 14:17 |
d1rk |
jperras: yeah - it is of no importance right now. I was just curious... |
| # |
Feb 18th 2009, 14:17 |
d1rk |
jperras: you are right, there is need for tests. but i like the process of an automatic deployment to an online.webserver so i (and others) can always check the current state of development as oposed everybody has to fetch latest sources and test them in their own environment... |