| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:27 |
alkemann |
but im unsure about timeline. i do use the footer on the current bakery, but i think i have never read or used the contents of the "Recent articles.." |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:27 |
jperras |
so a timeline-type of view is a way of correcting those flaws |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:27 |
alkemann |
yes |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:27 |
jperras |
and some of them are stale for weeks |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:26 |
jperras |
there are just too many boxes, currently |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:26 |
jperras |
well, I think it's a good compromise for the many different types of articles we currently show on the front page |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:25 |
alkemann |
u want to give most space for a timeline? |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:25 |
alkemann |
ok looking at it |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:24 |
jperras |
alkemann: yes |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:24 |
alkemann |
have to dl to see full size? |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:23 |
jperras |
but it's a pretty good app for filesharing |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:23 |
jperras |
yeah, I have no idea which ICANN country that belongs to |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:22 |
alkemann |
.io ? |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:22 |
jperras |
http://drop.io/jperras |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:22 |
jperras |
partly, yes |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:22 |
alkemann |
up late heh.. working on wires? |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:22 |
jperras |
my sleep schedule is pretty messed up |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:21 |
jperras |
EST time here, so 3:40am |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:21 |
alkemann |
9:40 am here |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:21 |
jperras |
alkemann: heh, kinda |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:20 |
alkemann |
good morning |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:20 |
alkemann |
yes |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 02:19 |
jperras |
alkemann: you there? |
| # |
Feb 18th 2009, 15:31 |
alkemann |
g'nite |
| # |
Feb 18th 2009, 14:26 |
d1rk |
jperras: what do you think the wireframes will be ready? |
| # |
Feb 18th 2009, 14:26 |
d1rk |
gotta go, see you all later. |
| # |
Feb 18th 2009, 14:21 |
d1rk |
alkemann: yes, especially if talking about features, but we have to do something before that, so if development cycles get shorter one could setup ci. |
| # |
Feb 18th 2009, 14:20 |
d1rk |
jperras: yeah - hehe. lets see if i can stretch this very day to 36 hours... uhm, no.. failed.. so... |
| # |
Feb 18th 2009, 14:20 |
alkemann |
being able to checkout the dev branch to an online server could be useful for sure |
| # |
Feb 18th 2009, 14:18 |
jperras |
d1rk: you make some good points, for sure. but yeah, I think we can drop this for the moment |
| # |
Feb 18th 2009, 14:17 |
d1rk |
jperras: yeah - it is of no importance right now. I was just curious... |
| # |
Feb 18th 2009, 14:17 |
d1rk |
jperras: you are right, there is need for tests. but i like the process of an automatic deployment to an online.webserver so i (and others) can always check the current state of development as oposed everybody has to fetch latest sources and test them in their own environment... |
| # |
Feb 18th 2009, 14:16 |
jperras |
in any case, I think this is a very unimportant point at this time, since individuals can create their own pre-commit hooks to ensure they haven't broken anything |
| # |
Feb 18th 2009, 14:15 |
jperras |
d1rk: not really. what's the point of having cont. integration to run all your tests if you're not writing tests as you develop more features? |
| # |
Feb 18th 2009, 14:15 |
alkemann |
i love tdd, but so far i have only made tests for behaviors, components and helpers. app tests seems like not so good in the reward/work area |
| # |
Feb 18th 2009, 14:14 |
d1rk |
jperras: it can be unrelated to code-coverage... |
| # |
Feb 18th 2009, 14:13 |
jperras |
alkemann: I tend to agree to some extent. for cont. integration to be useful, you need to maintain ~80% or better code coverage at all times |
| # |
Feb 18th 2009, 14:12 |
d1rk |
jperras: thank you. It looks promising |
| # |
Feb 18th 2009, 14:11 |
d1rk |
alkemann: if it is setup once, it makes the devs and all project-related persons happy :) |
| # |
Feb 18th 2009, 14:09 |
alkemann |
to me it sounds a little overkill, but i would be happy for the experience of doing this :) |
| # |
Feb 18th 2009, 14:02 |
jperras |
of course, you need to have the cake shell in your $PATH as well |