| # |
Feb 17th 2009, 12:50 |
alkemann1 |
my suggestion is that we agree that a behind the scenes system for publishing is good and specc/build it in a manner that lets us tweak the rules as we test it |
| # |
Feb 17th 2009, 12:46 |
alkemann1 |
gwoo: u see the wiki update? |
| # |
Feb 17th 2009, 08:56 |
alkemann |
laters :) |
| # |
Feb 17th 2009, 08:56 |
ADmad |
k ttyl |
| # |
Feb 17th 2009, 08:56 |
jperras |
alkemann: thanks for the link, I'll give it a read |
| # |
Feb 17th 2009, 08:55 |
alkemann |
anyways. time to head home from work |
| # |
Feb 17th 2009, 08:55 |
alkemann |
also, we have the select few system now and it is not working in regards to QA.. |
| # |
Feb 17th 2009, 08:54 |
alkemann |
select few with power means that things are pubished only at their leisure |
| # |
Feb 17th 2009, 08:53 |
ADmad |
alkemann: ? |
| # |
Feb 17th 2009, 08:53 |
alkemann |
ADmad: doing something about bottlenecks are also a point though |
| # |
Feb 17th 2009, 08:53 |
ADmad |
i dont want crap like this to be published at all http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/filling-a-select-with-tree-behavoir |
| # |
Feb 17th 2009, 08:52 |
ADmad |
rvv: yes i personally don't mind if only a select few have the power to make an article available to general public |
| # |
Feb 17th 2009, 08:52 |
alkemann |
well the goal should be that no bad practises are published :) |
| # |
Feb 17th 2009, 08:52 |
rvv |
I do like the side effect of all articles being rated, because it can be very hard for a noob to tell articles with good practices from those with bad |
| # |
Feb 17th 2009, 08:48 |
ADmad |
rvv: yeah... say for eg. a core member's vote will have more weight than a moderator |
| # |
Feb 17th 2009, 08:47 |
rvv |
ADmad: yeah, I agree.. I only mentioned it because it was my original idea, but I think the 2nd approach would be quite viable. especially if augmented with some "special" users' votes weight more to offset the problem of articles requiring many votes to be published |
| # |
Feb 17th 2009, 08:43 |
ADmad |
alkemann: yeah i checked... the first option is a bit overkill imo |
| # |
Feb 17th 2009, 08:42 |
alkemann |
ADmad: jperras: http://thechaw.com/bakery/wiki/spec/articles/publish-voting |
| # |
Feb 17th 2009, 02:44 |
alkemann |
http://thechaw.com/bakery/wiki/spec/articles/publish-voting |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 15:15 |
alkemann |
ronny he said he would do a write up of his original idea tomorrow morning |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 15:15 |
alkemann |
copy pasted log of this into wiki. http://thechaw.com/bakery/wiki/spec/articles/publish-voting |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 15:15 |
ADmad |
some value divided by no. of moderators ? |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 15:13 |
alkemann |
not sure i agree with only positive votes.. with it, eventually all articles could be published |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 15:04 |
alkemann |
if a moderator sends a message with suggested improvements, should the article then be put offline for all? |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 15:03 |
alkemann |
yea need some finess to this rule |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 15:03 |
jperras |
but I guess if we restrict it to needing at least one moderator it should be ok |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 15:03 |
jperras |
so over time, the more authors are added, the easier an article will become to push to the front page |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 15:02 |
jperras |
i.e. no one can 'vote down' an article |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 15:02 |
gwoo |
yeah |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 15:02 |
jperras |
only positive points allowed? |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 15:01 |
alkemann |
well lets say accepted authors have a value of 1, moderators of 5. need a value of 15 and at least 1 moderator |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 15:00 |
jperras |
my only concern is going to be what the threshold for 'higher level' users will be |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 14:58 |
gwoo |
ok |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 14:58 |
alkemann |
no. i asked my coworker to write it. so maybe tomorrow |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 14:57 |
gwoo |
yes |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 14:57 |
alkemann |
with this idea? |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 14:57 |
gwoo |
alkemann: did you update the docs? |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 14:56 |
alkemann |
cool. i think it could work very well |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 14:10 |
ADmad |
alkemann: really liked the idea about article going live for general public after reaching some level of rating from higher level users |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:40 |
alkemann |
seems like a logical solution. brb |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:40 |
alkemann |
what does it help you that i have a heat pump? that made no sense.. heh |