| # |
Feb 17th 2009, 08:48 |
ADmad |
rvv: yeah... say for eg. a core member's vote will have more weight than a moderator |
| # |
Feb 17th 2009, 08:47 |
rvv |
ADmad: yeah, I agree.. I only mentioned it because it was my original idea, but I think the 2nd approach would be quite viable. especially if augmented with some "special" users' votes weight more to offset the problem of articles requiring many votes to be published |
| # |
Feb 17th 2009, 08:43 |
ADmad |
alkemann: yeah i checked... the first option is a bit overkill imo |
| # |
Feb 17th 2009, 08:42 |
alkemann |
ADmad: jperras: http://thechaw.com/bakery/wiki/spec/articles/publish-voting |
| # |
Feb 17th 2009, 02:44 |
alkemann |
http://thechaw.com/bakery/wiki/spec/articles/publish-voting |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 15:15 |
alkemann |
ronny he said he would do a write up of his original idea tomorrow morning |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 15:15 |
alkemann |
copy pasted log of this into wiki. http://thechaw.com/bakery/wiki/spec/articles/publish-voting |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 15:15 |
ADmad |
some value divided by no. of moderators ? |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 15:13 |
alkemann |
not sure i agree with only positive votes.. with it, eventually all articles could be published |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 15:04 |
alkemann |
if a moderator sends a message with suggested improvements, should the article then be put offline for all? |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 15:03 |
alkemann |
yea need some finess to this rule |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 15:03 |
jperras |
but I guess if we restrict it to needing at least one moderator it should be ok |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 15:03 |
jperras |
so over time, the more authors are added, the easier an article will become to push to the front page |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 15:02 |
jperras |
i.e. no one can 'vote down' an article |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 15:02 |
gwoo |
yeah |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 15:02 |
jperras |
only positive points allowed? |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 15:01 |
alkemann |
well lets say accepted authors have a value of 1, moderators of 5. need a value of 15 and at least 1 moderator |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 15:00 |
jperras |
my only concern is going to be what the threshold for 'higher level' users will be |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 14:58 |
gwoo |
ok |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 14:58 |
alkemann |
no. i asked my coworker to write it. so maybe tomorrow |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 14:57 |
gwoo |
yes |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 14:57 |
alkemann |
with this idea? |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 14:57 |
gwoo |
alkemann: did you update the docs? |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 14:56 |
alkemann |
cool. i think it could work very well |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 14:10 |
ADmad |
alkemann: really liked the idea about article going live for general public after reaching some level of rating from higher level users |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:40 |
alkemann |
seems like a logical solution. brb |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:40 |
alkemann |
what does it help you that i have a heat pump? that made no sense.. heh |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:40 |
gwoo |
and put on a sweater |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:39 |
gwoo |
alkemann: move futher away from the heat source |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:39 |
gwoo |
nice |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:39 |
alkemann |
what do you do when you freeze on your arms and your eyes is going dry from the warm air coming from the heat pump above me? |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:39 |
jperras |
gwoo: got it. grazi |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:35 |
gwoo |
with the 10,000 things going through |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:35 |
gwoo |
especially in my mind |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:35 |
gwoo |
yeah |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:35 |
alkemann |
meant to and did are very close in the memory bank i beleive |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:34 |
alkemann |
lol |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:34 |
jperras |
hehe |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:34 |
gwoo |
jperras: would be hard for you because it looks like i never sent it |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:34 |
jperras |
might have been spam-filtered |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:34 |
jperras |
gwoo: I didn't get it |