| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:15 |
alkemann |
here im not talking about the 1-5, but this behind the scenes publish or not system |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:15 |
alkemann |
if you need x amount of points before the article goes public, we could give different power of voting to different user types and for amount of accepted articles |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:15 |
gwoo |
what else do you suggest? |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:14 |
jperras |
i.e. rating of 1 to 5 stars |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:14 |
jperras |
while we're on the topic of article ranking, I was wondering whether or not we are going to keep the same ranking scheme as the previous bakery |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:14 |
gwoo |
we can promote people based on how many articles they have written |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:13 |
gwoo |
alkemann: i kinda like that |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:13 |
alkemann |
and speaking about my coworker Ronny and bakery. he wrote up the article on the Dummy plugin and it is now pending moderation |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:12 |
alkemann |
as i said, i'll have him do a write up off it, but i like the general concept at least |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:11 |
alkemann |
it will give those accepted authors (who we will accept for quality) a say, spread the power, added level of QA and ease the workload of single moderators |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:09 |
alkemann |
great |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:09 |
jperras |
alkemann: thanks a ton. this'll help a lot with wireframes |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:09 |
jperras |
alkemann: just saw the list of use cases |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:08 |
alkemann |
my soon to be partner (in crime, not marriage), had an idea i asked him to write up for the bakery specc. i just got the gist of it, but i think it was something like : when a new article is posted by regular users, everyone above that level can read and rate them. instead of being published by single moderator, they get published after x amount of yes votes or by the rating system. or some such |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:08 |
gwoo |
alkemann: yeah its either teknoid, or mariano_iglesias |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:05 |
alkemann |
u told me to keep a look out.. i dont know if it's teknoid, but i think some of the latest stuff on bakery is a bit sub par |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:02 |
alkemann |
who's gonna read it but us though :p |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:02 |
alkemann |
haha |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:02 |
gwoo |
oops this channel is logged now |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:02 |
gwoo |
except when he was getting blowjobs in the oval office |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:01 |
gwoo |
Clinton made people happy |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:01 |
alkemann |
and Clinton.. i guess i cant type |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:01 |
alkemann |
s/then/them |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:00 |
gwoo |
so the 2nd Monday of every February is presidents day |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:00 |
alkemann |
if they devide the day between then, i assume Cliton has the "happy hour" ? |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:00 |
gwoo |
and Washington is the 15 |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:00 |
gwoo |
Lincoln's bday is on the 7th |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:00 |
gwoo |
really it is to honor Washington and Lincoln |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:00 |
gwoo |
yup |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 10:59 |
alkemann |
all of them? heh |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 10:59 |
gwoo |
Presidents Day |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 10:59 |
alkemann |
what holiday |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 10:58 |
gwoo |
its a holiday here today too :) |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 10:58 |
gwoo |
yeah seriously |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 10:58 |
gwoo |
hehe |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 10:57 |
alkemann |
good morning. i just came home from after job workout.. timezones a bitch :p |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 10:57 |
gwoo |
have not looked yet |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 10:57 |
gwoo |
alkemann: just waking up |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 10:56 |
alkemann |
gwoo: see the use case list? too many? |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 06:50 |
alkemann |
who is accepting articles to bakery lately? |
| # |
Feb 15th 2009, 11:38 |
alkemann |
close! |