| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 20:21 |
 kevin.pfeifer |
but if you manually create the mailer object anyways you should be fine |
| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 20:21 |
kevin.pfeifer |
But I currently don’t know if you can send reusable emails (like https://book.cakephp.org/4/en/core-libraries/email.html#creating-reusable-emails) via the queue mail task. I have already created an issue for that. |
| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 20:16 |
tyler.adam.lazenby |
Working on getting my data first and then going to see if I need to update to alpha... because I need to make sure I have some complex calculations done... by the end of the dasy |
| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 20:16 |
tyler.adam.lazenby |
@kevin.pfeifer I know I know... especially with abstraction |
| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 20:08 |
dereuromark |
Try the New alpha, I soon release then stable |
| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 19:58 |
kevin.pfeifer |
sometimes documentation is not that bad :) |
| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 19:57 |
tyler.adam.lazenby |
I was poking around in the source code and wasn't seeing that |
| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 19:57 |
tyler.adam.lazenby |
COOL |
| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 19:57 |
tyler.adam.lazenby |
oh ok |
| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 19:50 |
kevin.pfeifer |
https://github.com/dereuromark/cakephp-queue/tree/master/docs#using-built-in-email-task Here you can see that you can pass on a mailer object when creating the task => therefore yes, HTML mails are possible |
| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 19:42 |
tyler.adam.lazenby |
Hey @dereuromark Does your queue plugin default email task support sending HTML emails? |
| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 19:18 |
slackebot |
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/68184422/restrict-query-results-on-beforefind-table-call-back-without-breaking-buildrul |
| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 19:18 |
jadelbe418 |
I am running into some issues with sorting logic on a beforeFind() getting applied to constraints in the buildRules() when it should not be, on some legacy Cake 3 code I maintain. I was wondering if there is a better approach to implementing this than what I have in place. I wrote my question out with code samples on SO: |
| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 16:42 |
umer936 |
Yes, i get it while developing on Windows with PHPStorm. Never figured how to fix so I just run phpcs manually instead |
| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 16:04 |
japerlman |
@kevin.pfeifer Thanks for the feedback, I appreciate it. |
| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 15:31 |
ndm |
You gotta be careful with the term "request", that could easily be interpreted as "HTTP request", but I guess you're most likely referring to invoking some kind of read operation on a query/result in one and the same HTTP request? An answer to your question probably depends on how you generate the result set, how/where you apply the mapping, if you possibly reassign results, etc... so a code example might help here. |
| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 15:25 |
kevin.pfeifer |
@japerlman I would say either way is totally OK, it just depends what you/your customer prefers as a frontend experience and what you as a developer are more used to. |
| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 15:23 |
dereuromark |
Well, it is possible the the intoduced warning is a bit too harsh for some use cases, sure |
| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 15:22 |
slackebot |
react just because 'it is the modern way'. am I wasting my time and is there anything 'wrong' with just doing it 100% in cakephp like I've done previously? |
| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 15:22 |
japerlman |
I have very limited experience in web app dev and want to make sure I'm not approaching things incorrectly. If you were making an app that is just mostly data in/data out forms and reports is there any benefit to doing the backend in cakephp and exposing the api to a react front end? I've done two apps in the past 100% in cakephp 2 and 3 and I'm struggling with all the extra work to do the backend in cakephp and the frontend in |
| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 15:11 |
ndm |
Of course, I just don't see why it would be a problem in this specific case, unless the association is actually using a different target. Maybe I've overlooked that, and that is actually the case. |
| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 15:07 |
dereuromark |
npm: Sure, if those were fullly identical. but you could configure them slightly different each time, and in that case it would silently use a different one than you might want. So I guess that might have been the reason for the warning and the core to be a bit more strict since 4.1+ |
| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 15:05 |
ndm |
@conehead Did you check if using `getTarget()` makes a difference, like `$this->Users->Books->getTarget()->find()->...`? |
| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 15:03 |
ndm |
Didn't follow the whole saga... but that looks a bit weird, why would using the same alias be a problem here when the parent is a different object? Shouldn't that work fine if the target/classname are the same? :thinking_face: |
| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 14:35 |
dereuromark |
what we wish and reality often dont go hand in hand. While I agree with u, it is not feasible here, unfortunately |
| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 14:34 |
conehead |
Not convenient to have: Users->contain(['UsersTags']); Employees->contain(['EmployeesTags']); I'd prefer to have: Users->contain(['Tags']); Employees->contain(['Tags']); and use some internal alias |
| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 14:33 |
dereuromark |
thus the unique names here (aliases). |
| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 14:33 |
dereuromark |
well, relations (assoc) have to be unique across the project to allow the registry to not confuse them. |
| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 14:33 |
kevin.pfeifer |
yes |
| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 14:33 |
conehead |
that sucks :P |
| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 14:32 |
slackebot |
=> 'projects_projects', 'foreignKey' => 'parent_id', 'targetForeignKey' => 'child_id' ] );``` |
| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 14:32 |
kevin.pfeifer |
i e.g. use that to create child and parent projects like that ``` $this->belongsToMany( 'ParentProjects', [ 'className' => 'AlfredProjects.Projects', 'joinTable' => 'projects_projects', 'foreignKey' => 'child_id', 'targetForeignKey' => 'parent_id' ] ); $this->belongsToMany( 'ChildProjects', [ 'className' => 'AlfredProjects.Projects', 'joinTable' |
| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 14:32 |
conehead |
Ah...but that would mean in every conain I would have to use the Alias name as well? |
| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 14:29 |
kevin.pfeifer |
the first parameter is the alias. see the example here where hasOne is used to join on addresses multiple times https://book.cakephp.org/4/en/orm/associations.html#hasone-associations |
| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 14:27 |
dereuromark |
The alias is the name, so yes |
| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 14:19 |
conehead |
It is not just for behaviors, but for associations as well. Can I set the alias directly when setting an association? According to the documentation it is not a possible key https://book.cakephp.org/4/en/orm/associations.html#belongstomany-associations |
| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 14:18 |
erwane |
Autoanswer : pass the remember_me data in hidden field : https://github.com/andrej-griniuk/cakephp-two-factor-auth/issues/19 |
| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 14:13 |
dereuromark |
i dont follow. how is setting it through manual table different? its both config. and couldn't this be adapted to some kind of auto-config flag? so it can work across all Tables then as improvement directly on the behavior? sounds useful if you extensively use it. |
| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 14:10 |
conehead |
@dereuromark Guess tomorrow I will try to create my own table class that will automatically set the alias to $Alias$AssocName for each and every association. Setting in the config does work for your plugin, but won't work for other associations as the alias cannot be set there |
| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 14:05 |
erwane |
hi, it's me again ;) I'm trying to configure TFA Authentication plugin (https://github.com/andrej-griniuk/cakephp-two-factor-auth) with the `CookieAuthenticator aka remember_me` The request loose the `remember_me` field in the intermediate check form and cookie is not set. Someone already has this issue ? |
| # |
Jun 29th 2021, 13:51 |
slackebot |
a transaction yourself you will need to dispatch that event yourself too |