| # |
Jul 11th 2019, 00:06 |
 dereuromark |
it is the app local file |
| # |
Jul 11th 2019, 00:03 |
noel |
why is `config/app.php` included in `.gitignore`? |
| # |
Jul 10th 2019, 23:26 |
challgren |
and vendor/bin/* |
| # |
Jul 10th 2019, 23:26 |
cleptric |
*I also use this guide all the time :) |
| # |
Jul 10th 2019, 23:26 |
challgren |
you’d have to edit the shebang in ./bin/cake |
| # |
Jul 10th 2019, 23:26 |
cleptric |
I gave up on MAMP a while ago. It has way to many problems. As brew became more and more stable recently, I second @challgren guide and recommend you give it a try :slightly_smiling_face: |
| # |
Jul 10th 2019, 23:19 |
cleptric |
There is no need for a cake plugin. Our implementation required one custom authenticator (AuthComponent) only. Well, an access token gives you access to a specific scope and doesn't contain any information to properly authenticate a user. But it really depends what you are going to use OAuth for. Some grant types can be used for authentication as well |
| # |
Jul 10th 2019, 23:15 |
noel |
Is there not perhaps a way to force bake to use a particular version of PHP? |
| # |
Jul 10th 2019, 23:14 |
noel |
Thanks but I'm sold on MAMP. |
| # |
Jul 10th 2019, 22:37 |
challgren |
@noel https://getgrav.org/blog/macos-mojave-apache-multiple-php-versions this is a great resource for Mac users |
| # |
Jul 10th 2019, 22:33 |
noel |
It seems that `bin/cake bake` is using the default version of PHP that ships with mojave (which is 7.1.23 without `intl`). So it's not using the version of php I've specified in my `~/.profile`. |
| # |
Jul 10th 2019, 22:14 |
noel |
Also I've had to change macs and I've run into the whole `intl` problem again. Can't run cake bake because `intl` extension is not enabled. However if I do `php -m` at the shell I can see `intl` in that list. How do I solve this? |
| # |
Jul 10th 2019, 22:06 |
noel |
Hi guys. Any chance of an updated Sublime Text package for CakePHP? |
| # |
Jul 10th 2019, 17:26 |
dereuromark |
I opened some docs issues on the missing data. If only I had a bit more time then I would do it myself. |
| # |
Jul 10th 2019, 17:16 |
dereuromark |
bibel23 |
| # |
Jul 10th 2019, 15:28 |
neon1024 |
So this matches an expiry or null |
| # |
Jul 10th 2019, 15:27 |
neon1024 |
So I used `notMatching()` and then looked for the condition |
| # |
Jul 10th 2019, 15:27 |
neon1024 |
I ended up with this |
| # |
Jul 10th 2019, 15:27 |
slackebot |
<neon1024> |
| # |
Jul 10th 2019, 15:26 |
neon1024 |
It’s like saying I want this Article, but I want none or many associations, and using matching removes the parent record, right? |
| # |
Jul 10th 2019, 15:26 |
neon1024 |
I didn’t, but I have it in a project |
| # |
Jul 10th 2019, 15:25 |
neon1024 |
Let me check |
| # |
Jul 10th 2019, 15:25 |
neon1024 |
I think I blogged it |
| # |
Jul 10th 2019, 15:25 |
neon1024 |
I had to use an inverse not matching |
| # |
Jul 10th 2019, 15:25 |
neon1024 |
Oh so you want to optionally get associations? |
| # |
Jul 10th 2019, 15:24 |
waspinator |
right but I'm filtering articles based on associations, not just excluding associated data. I think I need to look at `leftJoinWith` |
| # |
Jul 10th 2019, 15:24 |
neon1024 |
That’s the approach I use anyway. If I’ve understood your use-case correctly that is 8) |
| # |
Jul 10th 2019, 15:23 |
slackebot |
<neon1024> |
| # |
Jul 10th 2019, 15:22 |
neon1024 |
Or better yet, use a custom finder on the table |
| # |
Jul 10th 2019, 15:22 |
neon1024 |
If you wanted to stipulate ‘new’ you’d use a callback in the contain to add a where condition |
| # |
Jul 10th 2019, 15:22 |
neon1024 |
Using contain will get you all associations |
| # |
Jul 10th 2019, 15:21 |
neon1024 |
It’s my understanding that that’s literally it’s job |
| # |
Jul 10th 2019, 15:21 |
neon1024 |
Yeah, you’re using inner join |
| # |
Jul 10th 2019, 15:20 |
waspinator |
when I have both the `innerJoinWith` the article has to have a new `comment` AND a new `tag` to be included in the results |
| # |
Jul 10th 2019, 15:19 |
waspinator |
well if an article only has a new comment I still want it |
| # |
Jul 10th 2019, 15:19 |
neon1024 |
$this->Articles->find()->contain([‘Comments’, ‘Tags’])` |
| # |
Jul 10th 2019, 15:19 |
neon1024 |
Like, logically they’d be equal right? |
| # |
Jul 10th 2019, 15:19 |
neon1024 |
Wouldn’t that be an and? |
| # |
Jul 10th 2019, 15:09 |
waspinator |
can you have two `->innerJoinWith`s do an `or` instead of an `and`? for example find all `articles` with new `comments` or new `tags` |
| # |
Jul 10th 2019, 15:03 |
neon1024 |
Was just making sure it would work, but it seems everything works ;) |
| # |
Jul 10th 2019, 15:03 |
neon1024 |
https://3v4l.org/59sPo |