Log message #4182322

# At Username Text
# Apr 5th 2019, 11:31 marek.sebera yes, you can see if the columns are unvalidated, then decide if that is something you want to change
# Apr 5th 2019, 11:31 neon1024 Er, no. TDD is a development methodology, and an Integration Test is a form of automated testing
# Apr 5th 2019, 11:31 neon1024 That’s be design, and presumably this functionality would flag that as an error or warning
# Apr 5th 2019, 11:31 marek.sebera integration test meaning TDD ?
# Apr 5th 2019, 11:30 neon1024 Also I have some columns which intentionally have no validation
# Apr 5th 2019, 11:30 neon1024 Wouldn’t that be an integration test?
# Apr 5th 2019, 11:30 marek.sebera basically even when the app works, checking, if all the columns are included in validator or model behavior, if db-table constraints are handled in `buildRules`, etc...
# Apr 5th 2019, 11:29 neon1024 Also not something which would be in the core in my opinion at least (I’m not in the core team)
# Apr 5th 2019, 11:29 neon1024 Sounds like a shell
# Apr 5th 2019, 11:28 marek.sebera @neon1024 rapid development validation, how to find out that db has changed without appropriate change in implementation, because that happens
# Apr 5th 2019, 11:26 neon1024 @marek.sebera What’s the use-case?
# Apr 5th 2019, 11:23 marek.sebera best I'd see is to iterate all available models in TableRegistry, and diff keys of getSchema()->columns and getValidator()->_fields
# Apr 5th 2019, 11:22 marek.sebera hi, before i write RFC ticket, is there any introspection validation of model validator, that would show, what model fields are not validated through default Validator?
# Apr 5th 2019, 11:22 val Hi, what would be the best place to call `ConnectionManager::alias('test', 'default');` when using standalone ORM? https://github.com/cakephp/orm
# Apr 5th 2019, 10:58 HD tamne cakephp aavde che
# Apr 5th 2019, 10:58 HD OKAY
# Apr 5th 2019, 10:57 HD HI
# Apr 5th 2019, 10:48 asdfgh done! good
# Apr 5th 2019, 10:43 asdfgh ok
# Apr 5th 2019, 10:43 asdfgh there is a key
# Apr 5th 2019, 10:41 asdfgh EncryptedCookieMiddleware
# Apr 5th 2019, 10:41 asdfgh that encrypt
# Apr 5th 2019, 10:40 asdfgh neon1024 no i said a stupid thing...the problem is the middlware
# Apr 5th 2019, 10:40 neon1024 No.
# Apr 5th 2019, 10:40 asdfgh neon1024 so creating a similar cookie class that accept the key as parameter
# Apr 5th 2019, 10:36 neon1024 Although you’d probably have to inject it into the Cookie class when it’s instantiated, or when you’re writing cookies
# Apr 5th 2019, 10:36 neon1024 You could just do a new Configure::write() to create a new key for cookies
# Apr 5th 2019, 10:35 asdfgh is it better to ask users to update their passwords?
# Apr 5th 2019, 10:27 asdfgh *i have used
# Apr 5th 2019, 10:25 asdfgh how can i create a custom encrypt key for cookie only ?
# Apr 5th 2019, 10:25 asdfgh but i cannot change the salt (for the Auth component reason)
# Apr 5th 2019, 10:25 asdfgh because i encrypt the cookie
# Apr 5th 2019, 10:25 asdfgh dereuromark last thing...i have using an old security salt...now i get Invalid key for encrypt(), key must be at least 256 bits (32 bytes) long.
# Apr 5th 2019, 10:25 asdfgh ok
# Apr 5th 2019, 10:23 dereuromark maybe there is withCookies()?
# Apr 5th 2019, 10:23 dereuromark check if you can combine them somehow.
# Apr 5th 2019, 10:23 asdfgh i do not like it too
# Apr 5th 2019, 10:23 asdfgh ?
# Apr 5th 2019, 10:23 asdfgh dereuromark so basicaly if i have two cookie i must do $this->response = $this->response->withCookie(new Cookie(ONE)) and again $this->response = $this->response->withCookie(new Cookie(TWO))
# Apr 5th 2019, 10:20 dereuromark i dont like it either, but thats how the psr people wanted to have request and response
# Apr 5th 2019, 10:20 dereuromark its called immutability