| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 11:31 |
 neon1024 |
That’s be design, and presumably this functionality would flag that as an error or warning |
| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 11:31 |
marek.sebera |
integration test meaning TDD ? |
| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 11:30 |
neon1024 |
Also I have some columns which intentionally have no validation |
| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 11:30 |
neon1024 |
Wouldn’t that be an integration test? |
| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 11:30 |
marek.sebera |
basically even when the app works, checking, if all the columns are included in validator or model behavior, if db-table constraints are handled in `buildRules`, etc... |
| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 11:29 |
neon1024 |
Also not something which would be in the core in my opinion at least (I’m not in the core team) |
| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 11:29 |
neon1024 |
Sounds like a shell |
| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 11:28 |
marek.sebera |
@neon1024 rapid development validation, how to find out that db has changed without appropriate change in implementation, because that happens |
| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 11:26 |
neon1024 |
@marek.sebera What’s the use-case? |
| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 11:23 |
marek.sebera |
best I'd see is to iterate all available models in TableRegistry, and diff keys of getSchema()->columns and getValidator()->_fields |
| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 11:22 |
marek.sebera |
hi, before i write RFC ticket, is there any introspection validation of model validator, that would show, what model fields are not validated through default Validator? |
| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 11:22 |
val |
Hi, what would be the best place to call `ConnectionManager::alias('test', 'default');` when using standalone ORM? https://github.com/cakephp/orm |
| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 10:58 |
HD |
tamne cakephp aavde che |
| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 10:58 |
HD |
OKAY |
| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 10:57 |
HD |
HI |
| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 10:48 |
asdfgh |
done! good |
| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 10:43 |
asdfgh |
ok |
| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 10:43 |
asdfgh |
there is a key |
| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 10:41 |
asdfgh |
EncryptedCookieMiddleware |
| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 10:41 |
asdfgh |
that encrypt |
| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 10:40 |
asdfgh |
neon1024 no i said a stupid thing...the problem is the middlware |
| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 10:40 |
neon1024 |
No. |
| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 10:40 |
asdfgh |
neon1024 so creating a similar cookie class that accept the key as parameter |
| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 10:36 |
neon1024 |
Although you’d probably have to inject it into the Cookie class when it’s instantiated, or when you’re writing cookies |
| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 10:36 |
neon1024 |
You could just do a new Configure::write() to create a new key for cookies |
| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 10:35 |
asdfgh |
is it better to ask users to update their passwords? |
| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 10:27 |
asdfgh |
*i have used |
| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 10:25 |
asdfgh |
how can i create a custom encrypt key for cookie only ? |
| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 10:25 |
asdfgh |
but i cannot change the salt (for the Auth component reason) |
| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 10:25 |
asdfgh |
because i encrypt the cookie |
| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 10:25 |
asdfgh |
dereuromark last thing...i have using an old security salt...now i get Invalid key for encrypt(), key must be at least 256 bits (32 bytes) long. |
| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 10:25 |
asdfgh |
ok |
| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 10:23 |
dereuromark |
maybe there is withCookies()? |
| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 10:23 |
dereuromark |
check if you can combine them somehow. |
| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 10:23 |
asdfgh |
i do not like it too |
| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 10:23 |
asdfgh |
? |
| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 10:23 |
asdfgh |
dereuromark so basicaly if i have two cookie i must do $this->response = $this->response->withCookie(new Cookie(ONE)) and again $this->response = $this->response->withCookie(new Cookie(TWO)) |
| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 10:20 |
dereuromark |
i dont like it either, but thats how the psr people wanted to have request and response |
| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 10:20 |
dereuromark |
its called immutability |
| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 10:18 |
asdfgh |
?? |
| # |
Apr 5th 2019, 10:18 |
asdfgh |
$this->response = $response; |