| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 18:21 |
 ricksaccous |
based on conventions |
| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 18:21 |
ricksaccous |
so HealthRecordsTable.php is what the table class should be called |
| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 18:20 |
ricksaccous |
it's always Table.php |
| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 18:20 |
ricksaccous |
baked that* |
| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 18:20 |
ricksaccous |
it should not have backed that |
| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 18:20 |
ricksaccous |
not Tables.php |
| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 18:20 |
ricksaccous |
HealthRecordsTable.php |
| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 18:20 |
ricksaccous |
it should have been called |
| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 18:15 |
jnguyen |
not sure pasting the code would help because the baking seems to be all correct |
| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 18:14 |
jnguyen |
```SQLSTATE[42S02]: Base table or view not found: 1146 Table 'sparkplug.health_record' doesn't exist``` |
| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 18:14 |
jnguyen |
so my exact problem is I made a table called health_records, baked the model and it produced an entity called HealthRecord.php and the table HealthRecordsTables.php. Tried to save data to it and it threw me this error |
| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 18:11 |
ricksaccous |
ie it's not finding my MagicRunes table |
| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 18:11 |
ricksaccous |
and stated exactly what the problem was |
| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 18:10 |
ricksaccous |
prob would be easier if you pasted the code in a gist or something |
| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 18:10 |
jnguyen |
ah figured |
| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 18:10 |
jnguyen |
sorry mean pluarl |
| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 18:10 |
ricksaccous |
table class should be plural |
| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 18:10 |
ricksaccous |
no |
| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 18:09 |
jnguyen |
if im correct the table itself has to be singular correct? |
| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 18:09 |
jnguyen |
Hey guys, so I just baked a model, the table is plural and the entity is singular, but im getting a base table not found because its looking for the singular version of the table |
| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 14:58 |
emiliano |
thanks a lot |
| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 14:58 |
emiliano |
my problem, is the aws elastic beanstalk jeje |
| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 14:56 |
jeremyharris |
yeah htaccess can do that |
| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 14:55 |
emiliano |
is there any way to tell you to generate all the urls in https, htaccess? |
| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 14:55 |
emiliano |
Hi guys, how are you? I'm working with cake 3.5 and aws elastic-beanstalk, is there any way to focus urls to https? When I use a json call, I generate the url in http and I have mixed content, i dont no way |
| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 14:40 |
feLiruc |
I did exactly what you said guys, I created a string with the correct index, and increment it everytime the user add one more line... but, for me this is so kluge... |
| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 14:35 |
ricksaccous |
it's really subjective and there's no set example anywhere, so you'll have to find a solution that works for you |
| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 14:35 |
ricksaccous |
use whatever js solution you think is appropriate to get n inputs |
| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 14:35 |
jeremyharris |
^ |
| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 14:35 |
ricksaccous |
and once you know how that works |
| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 14:35 |
ricksaccous |
one of a hasMany |
| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 14:35 |
ricksaccous |
yeah, i think that's what you mean, well my advice feLiruc is just focus on getting one to save |
| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 14:34 |
ricksaccous |
oh, you mean just for duplicating inputs? |
| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 14:34 |
jeremyharris |
there’s no “official” example I don’t think, but calling any controller action via ajax will load the view into the ajax layout if you are using the request handler |
| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 14:33 |
ricksaccous |
i'm not quite sure what that would entail |
| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 14:32 |
ricksaccous |
meh, but yeah, maybe i should try adding it with ajax though to be honest |
| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 14:32 |
feLiruc |
There is any example of this ajax in the controller? |
| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 14:32 |
ricksaccous |
i just organize the input into an element where you can specify the index |
| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 14:32 |
ricksaccous |
not necessarily, think i just needed a foreach to spit out the element, but yeah, it's somehting to consider |
| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 14:31 |
jeremyharris |
I typically prefer the ajax solution then there’s significantly less JS and it reuses existing pages and proven functionality |
| # |
Mar 19th 2019, 14:31 |
jeremyharris |
tough when dealing with validation errors |