| # |
Jun 16th 2018, 02:31 |
Guest82403 |
This is with whatever cakephp/app chooses as the default version, and dereuromark/cakephp-ide-helper was listed in the recommend block. |
| # |
Jun 16th 2018, 02:21 |
 dereuromark |
go oldschool |
| # |
Jun 16th 2018, 02:21 |
dereuromark |
Sounds like u are using the new plugin loading with plugins that dont do this yet. |
| # |
Jun 16th 2018, 01:47 |
Guest82403 |
t be found. Ensure your autoloader is correct." Apparently I missed a setup step. |
| # |
Jun 16th 2018, 01:47 |
Guest82403 |
So I haven't used CakePHP in years, and I have no idea how to debug a broken plugin. Tried to enable dereuromark/cakephp-ide-helper. It's in the composer.json and the vendor directory, but if I add it to Application.php attempting to use bin/cake returns "PHP Fatal error: Uncaught InvalidArgumentException: The plugin class `IdeHelper\Plugin` canno |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 22:33 |
squeeze |
route is missing on customer prefix i guess ? |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 22:27 |
mike__ |
https://thepasteb.in/p/2RhK4zD558Qu4 |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 22:23 |
mike__ |
when i load the view i have the follow error |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 22:22 |
mike__ |
the second form is with url option ( 'url' => ['controller' => 'Deactivations', 'action' => 'index' ]) |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 22:21 |
mike__ |
the first form is from view's controller ( users ) |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 22:20 |
mike__ |
i want to do 2 forms into the same view |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 22:20 |
mike__ |
i have some problem with formhelper |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 22:16 |
mike__ |
hello everybody |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 21:04 |
itmpls |
anyone use cakephp-subdomains or similar in 3.6+ for a dynamic subdomain setup? |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 20:46 |
blackjccl |
File uploaded https://cakesf.slack.com/files/U5V7HDBHC/FB8C9SK28/-.php / https://slack-files.com/T053DPNCM-FB8C9SK28-09e61014ba |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 20:45 |
blackjccl |
my code |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 20:45 |
blackjccl |
"Cannot get an empty property" |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 20:45 |
blackjccl |
the error is as follows |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 20:44 |
blackjccl |
I have the following problem when I want to save in the same entity several times |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 20:43 |
blackjccl |
hi community |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 19:22 |
tewinkel |
quit |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 19:16 |
tewinkel |
If I view a single organisation, I see all deliveries, but I see only the ids of driver, fruit and supermarket. I would like to see the names. |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 19:15 |
lorenzo |
@itmpls I also vote for single db for all tenants |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 19:14 |
tewinkel |
My main table is organisation. Every organisation has a list of delivery-actions, which consist of a combination of fruit, driver and supermarket. |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 19:12 |
tewinkel |
Yes sorry, dont know how to format my question properly |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 19:12 |
mikesmoniker |
pastebin that? |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 19:09 |
tewinkel |
test\ntest |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 19:07 |
tewinkel |
ruits. I want to see the names |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 19:07 |
tewinkel |
I have these tables: fruits ------- id name drivers ------- id name supermarkets ------------- id name deliveries ------------- fruit_id driver_id supermarket_id organisation_id organisations -------------- id name .... many fields --- I have baken the source for my application. If I take a look at a single organisation, i can see all deliveries belonging to this organisation. But the table of deliveries contains only the |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 19:07 |
itmpls |
ask away |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 19:06 |
tewinkel |
Hello! I need some help concerning table joins. Are there any experts round here? |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 18:32 |
itmpls |
probably going with a single db for simplicity and i'm not gonna have hundreds of tenants or anything |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 18:29 |
admad |
@mikesmoniker very insightful response :+1: |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 18:27 |
itmpls |
thank you @mikesmoniker |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 18:20 |
itmpls |
ah ok |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 18:17 |
mikesmoniker |
Final thought: if you do go with multiple DBs, please research how to properly encrypt their individual credentials. Don’t just throw them in a table somewhere in the clear. That seems to occur in the wild way more than it should. |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 18:16 |
mikesmoniker |
But I wouldn’t necessarily advise designing _for_ those kinds of horrible cases. Presumably you have good design, tests, etc. to mitigate those risks. |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 18:16 |
mikesmoniker |
The times I did multi-DB didn’t really fall under those scenarios, but the benefits included things like a breach/security issue (in theory) only put one customer at-risk, it was virtually impossible for a bug to cause one customer to see another’s data, and if we screwed something up big time we could roll back a single customer’s DB without having to stitch together data. |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 18:14 |
mikesmoniker |
My advice is a single DB for all tenants unless you have a compelling reason not to (e.g. serious privacy/compliance concerns, scaling to millions of customers, etc.). It’s way simpler. |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 18:13 |
mikesmoniker |
A couple things to consider: would you pair a codebase with each db. (e.g. one instance of the app to many DBs, or one-to-one? The former makes DB migrations complicated.) Do you need to do complex cross-tenant reporting. |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 18:11 |
itmpls |
any recommendations specifically from experience? |