| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 21:04 |
 itmpls |
anyone use cakephp-subdomains or similar in 3.6+ for a dynamic subdomain setup? |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 20:46 |
blackjccl |
File uploaded https://cakesf.slack.com/files/U5V7HDBHC/FB8C9SK28/-.php / https://slack-files.com/T053DPNCM-FB8C9SK28-09e61014ba |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 20:45 |
blackjccl |
my code |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 20:45 |
blackjccl |
"Cannot get an empty property" |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 20:45 |
blackjccl |
the error is as follows |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 20:44 |
blackjccl |
I have the following problem when I want to save in the same entity several times |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 20:43 |
blackjccl |
hi community |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 19:22 |
tewinkel |
quit |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 19:16 |
tewinkel |
If I view a single organisation, I see all deliveries, but I see only the ids of driver, fruit and supermarket. I would like to see the names. |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 19:15 |
lorenzo |
@itmpls I also vote for single db for all tenants |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 19:14 |
tewinkel |
My main table is organisation. Every organisation has a list of delivery-actions, which consist of a combination of fruit, driver and supermarket. |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 19:12 |
tewinkel |
Yes sorry, dont know how to format my question properly |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 19:12 |
mikesmoniker |
pastebin that? |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 19:09 |
tewinkel |
test\ntest |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 19:07 |
tewinkel |
ruits. I want to see the names |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 19:07 |
tewinkel |
I have these tables: fruits ------- id name drivers ------- id name supermarkets ------------- id name deliveries ------------- fruit_id driver_id supermarket_id organisation_id organisations -------------- id name .... many fields --- I have baken the source for my application. If I take a look at a single organisation, i can see all deliveries belonging to this organisation. But the table of deliveries contains only the |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 19:07 |
itmpls |
ask away |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 19:06 |
tewinkel |
Hello! I need some help concerning table joins. Are there any experts round here? |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 18:32 |
itmpls |
probably going with a single db for simplicity and i'm not gonna have hundreds of tenants or anything |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 18:29 |
admad |
@mikesmoniker very insightful response :+1: |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 18:27 |
itmpls |
thank you @mikesmoniker |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 18:20 |
itmpls |
ah ok |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 18:17 |
mikesmoniker |
Final thought: if you do go with multiple DBs, please research how to properly encrypt their individual credentials. Don’t just throw them in a table somewhere in the clear. That seems to occur in the wild way more than it should. |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 18:16 |
mikesmoniker |
But I wouldn’t necessarily advise designing _for_ those kinds of horrible cases. Presumably you have good design, tests, etc. to mitigate those risks. |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 18:16 |
mikesmoniker |
The times I did multi-DB didn’t really fall under those scenarios, but the benefits included things like a breach/security issue (in theory) only put one customer at-risk, it was virtually impossible for a bug to cause one customer to see another’s data, and if we screwed something up big time we could roll back a single customer’s DB without having to stitch together data. |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 18:14 |
mikesmoniker |
My advice is a single DB for all tenants unless you have a compelling reason not to (e.g. serious privacy/compliance concerns, scaling to millions of customers, etc.). It’s way simpler. |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 18:13 |
mikesmoniker |
A couple things to consider: would you pair a codebase with each db. (e.g. one instance of the app to many DBs, or one-to-one? The former makes DB migrations complicated.) Do you need to do complex cross-tenant reporting. |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 18:11 |
itmpls |
any recommendations specifically from experience? |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 18:11 |
itmpls |
gotcha. I was thinking a db per tenant honestly because the rollbacks and what not would be easier, but it might be a little bit more of a setup |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 18:10 |
mikesmoniker |
Nope, but the _how_ is pretty similar across all frameworks. |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 18:10 |
itmpls |
have you done it specific to cake though? |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 18:10 |
mikesmoniker |
I think there was also a full stack radio podcast episode about it somewhat recently, if I remember correctly. |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 18:09 |
mikesmoniker |
@itmpls Sure. I’ve worked on multi-tenant apps that did it both of the common ways. I’d hit the Google, as there is a lot written out there on the subject. |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 18:03 |
itmpls |
more specifically i suppose, has anyone delegated a db per client/tenant in a saas architecture? or not? |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 18:00 |
slackebot |
~tell medes about anyone |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 18:00 |
slackebot |
Command sent from Slack by admad: |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 17:58 |
blackjccl |
Hi community |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 17:57 |
itmpls |
has anyone done any saas stuff? |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 16:38 |
camdenbassett |
@dereuromark Yes, thanks. I'll most likely put just put them in the webroot folder, but it's good to know I'd need to do some through-putting if I stored it somewhere else. |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 16:20 |
ngashpoll |
Thanks @dereuromark for clarifying that. |
| # |
Jun 15th 2018, 16:12 |
dereuromark |
camdenbassett: that depends if they may be public or not. the latter must NOT be in the webroot obviously, but served via some response through-putting from below the surface (e.g. stored in /files or sth) |