| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 21:07 |
meder |
totally not replicatable on local or staging, and the additional complexity of load balancers |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 21:07 |
meder |
dereuromark: yeah, i understand that but after a thousand things i was trying to come up with some ideas |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 20:16 |
 savant |
we setup a dedicated performance testing environment at work |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 20:12 |
dereuromark |
there is also tideways, a bit cheaper service, but definitely dont try any custom PHP solutions, those will only hurt performance without really doing a good measuring job. |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 20:08 |
admad |
meder: if you want to check performance in production use something like newrelic or blackfire |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 19:47 |
dereuromark |
man :slightly_smiling_face: i shouldnt even have to say this |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 19:47 |
dereuromark |
doing this on a production server? thats a totally bad idea. use a separate staging server or locally |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 19:42 |
meder |
Controller.initialize to afterRender perhaps? |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 19:42 |
meder |
is there a recommended hook i can bind to measure cake performance overall? i tried to install xhprof but it's a headache now due to package limitations on the production server. was going to just cake debug performance inside of a controller |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:32 |
obinoob |
savant it worked like a charm ;) thank you so much |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:18 |
birdy247 |
just something to do with the profiles |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:17 |
birdy247 |
I think its installed |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:14 |
birdy247 |
@savant I am using nvm to install it |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:14 |
savant |
@birdy247 where is node installed? |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:13 |
savant |
you should run the same code locally and remotely |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:13 |
savant |
probably |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:13 |
destinydriven |
would that make a significant difference? |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:13 |
destinydriven |
@savant actually php version on dev is 7.1 . . . production is 7.0 |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:12 |
destinydriven |
I’m still wondering if there’s some other variable that could be causing that |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:12 |
birdy247 |
any idea why whenever I vagrant halt, the npm/node that I installed is not there when i vagrant up next time? |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:11 |
destinydriven |
ok thanks |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:11 |
savant |
thats how we run it |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:11 |
destinydriven |
hmm, is that advisable? |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:11 |
savant |
give php more memory, like 2gb |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:10 |
savant |
so thats why i think its trying to actually generate a larger pdf |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:10 |
savant |
more data == more memory usage |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:10 |
destinydriven |
same cake 2.10.8, same database |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:10 |
savant |
doubt it |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:10 |
destinydriven |
same everything |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:10 |
savant |
same php version? |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:09 |
savant |
are you using the same cakephp version? |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:09 |
destinydriven |
@savant same size |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:09 |
savant |
@destinydriven is the pdf its trying to generate bigger? |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:09 |
savant |
sure you can do that |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:09 |
obinoob |
savant that is so cool I'm guessing it should go in Table right after hasMany? |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:08 |
destinydriven |
CakePdf memory limit issue: My dev server has in php-ini memory_limit: 128M and generates a 16MB pdf file without problem. Production server memory_limit has been bumped to 512M and throws Allowed memory size of 536870912 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 536870920 bytes). Is there some other explanation as to why a server with 4 times allocated memory? |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:06 |
obinoob |
savant thats what I did |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:06 |
admad |
obinoob: most likely this is what you are looking for https://gist.github.com/ADmad/0a451d837f019edf3447 |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:06 |
savant |
if its not hasMany, dont use hasMany. hasOne is there for a reason |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:06 |
savant |
if you want to find only one instance for a related table, do a separate query against that table |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:06 |
savant |
not joins |