| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:13 |
 savant |
you should run the same code locally and remotely |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:13 |
savant |
probably |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:13 |
destinydriven |
would that make a significant difference? |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:13 |
destinydriven |
@savant actually php version on dev is 7.1 . . . production is 7.0 |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:12 |
destinydriven |
I’m still wondering if there’s some other variable that could be causing that |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:12 |
birdy247 |
any idea why whenever I vagrant halt, the npm/node that I installed is not there when i vagrant up next time? |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:11 |
destinydriven |
ok thanks |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:11 |
savant |
thats how we run it |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:11 |
destinydriven |
hmm, is that advisable? |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:11 |
savant |
give php more memory, like 2gb |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:10 |
savant |
so thats why i think its trying to actually generate a larger pdf |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:10 |
savant |
more data == more memory usage |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:10 |
destinydriven |
same cake 2.10.8, same database |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:10 |
savant |
doubt it |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:10 |
destinydriven |
same everything |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:10 |
savant |
same php version? |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:09 |
savant |
are you using the same cakephp version? |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:09 |
destinydriven |
@savant same size |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:09 |
savant |
@destinydriven is the pdf its trying to generate bigger? |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:09 |
savant |
sure you can do that |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:09 |
obinoob |
savant that is so cool I'm guessing it should go in Table right after hasMany? |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:08 |
destinydriven |
CakePdf memory limit issue: My dev server has in php-ini memory_limit: 128M and generates a 16MB pdf file without problem. Production server memory_limit has been bumped to 512M and throws Allowed memory size of 536870912 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 536870920 bytes). Is there some other explanation as to why a server with 4 times allocated memory? |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:06 |
obinoob |
savant thats what I did |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:06 |
admad |
obinoob: most likely this is what you are looking for https://gist.github.com/ADmad/0a451d837f019edf3447 |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:06 |
savant |
if its not hasMany, dont use hasMany. hasOne is there for a reason |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:06 |
savant |
if you want to find only one instance for a related table, do a separate query against that table |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:06 |
savant |
not joins |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:06 |
savant |
first() only applies to the top-level Table |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:05 |
obinoob |
err: on = one |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:05 |
obinoob |
savant the same happens with users... conceptually it is a collection of things, if I know it will return only on item from the table I can use first() and get the things easier... |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:03 |
savant |
but note: no certificates == your code will break |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:03 |
savant |
there is no way to do what you want to do without defining a new relationship or making a method in the entity that returns the first certificate |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:02 |
savant |
similarly, if there were no results, it would be an array of size zero |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:02 |
savant |
its just a collection of size 1 |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:01 |
savant |
you _want_ it to make sense, but its still a collection of things |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:01 |
savant |
the relationship does |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:01 |
savant |
the limit doesnt decide whether its a single or multiple |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:00 |
obinoob |
savant yes the relationship is hasMany but it still makes sense since first() === limit => 1, so if it conditions accept 'limit' key I don't see why not return "certificate" object?!? |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 17:58 |
lordyuri92 |
hello |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 17:55 |
savant |
since the relationship is hasMany |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 17:55 |
savant |
cant do that |